On 02-May-22 09:02, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 03:39:33PM +0200, Bjørn Mork<bj...@mork.no> wrote a message of 14 lines which said:Which problems do LOC solve? I remember adding LOC records for fun?() in the previous millennium when RFC 1876 was fresh out of the press. But even back then paranoia finally took over, and I deleted all of them. Don't think I ever found anything to actually use them for.Fun is a sufficient reason. French zip codes to LOC: % dig +short +nodnssec LOC 34000.cp.bortzmeyer.fr 43 36 47.108 N 3 52 9.113 E 0.00m 1m 10000m 10m https://www.bortzmeyer.org/dns-code-postal-lonlat.html (in French)
I would never discourage anyone from having (harmless) fun.On the other hand, unless your codes postaux are spherical (or a circular projection), your LOC will be at best an approximation of a point in the postal zone. Perhaps the post office, or the geographic center, or a public building, or a monument, or the best restaurant, or...? LOC can't represent the boundaries of most (any?) postal zones, as they tend to be polygons (or with curves, simply a closed path). So the most fun may be guessing the meaning of the result :-)
Still, overall DNS seems to generate more problems than fun, so if LOC provides amusement, it's a good thing.
Malheureusement, LOC's practical application remains unclear. Timothe Litt ACM Distinguished Engineer -------------------------- This communication may not represent the ACM or my employer's views, if any, on the matters discussed.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users