On 02-May-22 09:02, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 03:39:33PM +0200,
  Bjørn Mork<bj...@mork.no>  wrote
  a message of 14 lines which said:

Which problems do LOC solve?

I remember adding LOC records for fun?() in the previous millennium when
RFC 1876 was fresh out of the press.  But even back then paranoia
finally took over, and I deleted all of them.

Don't think I ever found anything to actually use them for.
Fun is a sufficient reason.

French zip codes to LOC:

% dig +short +nodnssec LOC 34000.cp.bortzmeyer.fr
43 36 47.108 N 3 52 9.113 E 0.00m 1m 10000m 10m

https://www.bortzmeyer.org/dns-code-postal-lonlat.html  (in French)

I would never discourage anyone from having (harmless) fun.

On the other hand, unless your codes postaux are spherical (or a circular projection), your LOC will be at best an approximation of a point in the postal zone.  Perhaps the post office, or the geographic center, or a public building, or a monument, or the best restaurant, or...?  LOC can't represent the boundaries of most (any?) postal zones, as they tend to be polygons (or with curves, simply a closed path).  So the most fun may be guessing the meaning of the result :-)

Still, overall DNS seems to generate more problems than fun, so if LOC provides amusement, it's a good thing.

Malheureusement, LOC's practical application remains unclear.

Timothe Litt
ACM Distinguished Engineer
--------------------------
This communication may not represent the ACM or my employer's views,
if any, on the matters discussed.


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to