Am 26.11.20 um 03:01 schrieb Mark Andrews:
The message that generated this thread had the following:
To: upendra.gan...@gmail.com
Cc: bind-users , BIND Users
Note the 2 different addresses for bind-users. Both where delivered to
lists.isc.org in a single SMTP
transaction as you noted (ESMT
Am 25.11.20 um 04:46 schrieb Jim Popovitch via bind-users:
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 22:22 -0500, Paul Kosinski wrote:
My reading of the headers (below) does *not* suggest "Reply All".
Rather, they show that mx.pao1.isc.org sent/forwarded the email once,
and it was received by lists.isc.org once
Am 23.11.20 um 04:58 schrieb Jim Popovitch via bind-users:
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 21:56 -0500, Paul Kosinski via bind-users wrote:
I've been getting two identical copies of recent posts to this list...
Me too, but it's because of people hitting reply-all thinking that they
are replying to th
Hey Onur,
I would guess it depends on your setup and how many traffic you
receive. [1] gives
as an example a value of 10 responses per second, which I would say is
a good place
to start. [5] gives a value of 5 responses per second and I get the
impression that
that is the value used by the F roo
4 matches
Mail list logo
