RE: Issues resolving outlook.office365.com

2016-06-17 Thread Darcy Kevin (FCA)
I think what the kids would say is "client PCAP or it didn't happen". Now, get off my lawn... :-) - Kevin -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of John W. Blue Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016

RE: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-17 Thread Tony Finch
Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote: > My understanding is that the "extra" stuff wouldn't have any signature > at all. I'm not sure if the question was that well specified :-) > Wouldn't that break DNSSEC if the rest of the response had signatures? > Or does the DNSSEC-validation algorithm support "hybrid

Re: Append a Hard-coded Text Tuple into Additional Section of "dig" Feature

2016-06-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 15.06.16 18:43, Jun Xiang X Tee wrote: When I query for "google.com", the additional section returned is: ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ns1.google.com. 200487 IN A 216.239.32.10 ns2.google.com. 197774 IN A 216.239.34.10 ns3.google.com. 246981 I