Darcy Kevin (FCA) <kevin.da...@fcagroup.com> wrote:

> My understanding is that the "extra" stuff wouldn't have any signature
> at all.

I'm not sure if the question was that well specified :-)

> Wouldn't that break DNSSEC if the rest of the response had signatures?
> Or does the DNSSEC-validation algorithm support "hybrid" responses like
> that?

I believe BIND works more like the latter but unbound works more like the
former.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <d...@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
Bailey: Variable becoming southeast 3 or 4, increasing 5 or 6. Slight or
moderate. Rain later in southwest. Good.
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to