Re: still have named memory leak

On Friday 12/12/2014 at 10:12 am, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: Hi Len On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:52:23AM -0600, lcon...@go2france.com wrote: binary upgraded Freebsd 10 to Freebsd 10.1 named 9.10.1, compiled from source at named start, 305 MB memory after several hours of running named is

Re: still have named memory leak

Hi Len On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:52:23AM -0600, lcon...@go2france.com wrote: > binary upgraded Freebsd 10 to Freebsd 10.1 > > named 9.10.1, compiled from source > > at named start, 305 MB memory > > after several hours of running named is approaching 800 MB. I'm sure after a > couple of days,

still have named memory leak

binary upgraded Freebsd 10 to Freebsd 10.1 named 9.10.1, compiled from source at named start, 305 MB memory after several hours of running named is approaching 800 MB. I'm sure after a couple of days, as before, it will head towards 2000 MB suggestions? this is a recursive only NS, about

Re: Question about new options (9.9.6-P1)

양지은 wrote: > > I have a question about new options, max-recursion-depth and > max-recursion-queries in 9.9.6-P1. > Would you teach me how the options work? The ARM has a fairly complete description. Does it answer your questions? ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.9.6-P1/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.ch06.html#max