On Friday 12/12/2014 at 10:12 am, Mukund Sivaraman  wrote:
Hi Len

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:52:23AM -0600, lcon...@go2france.com wrote:

binary upgraded Freebsd 10 to Freebsd 10.1

named  9.10.1, compiled from source

at named start, 305 MB memory

after several hours of running named is approaching 800 MB. I'm sure after a
couple of days, as before, it will head towards 2000 MB

suggestions?

this is a recursive only NS, about 20M q/day restricted by ACL to
"ournetworks"

This tells us that the named process size grows large, but more
information is needed to discover why. Can you send us the following?

1. Your named configuration.

2. Regular dumps over time of the statistics that are available via
HTTP, as the named process grows. See the "statistics-channels"
documentation in the manual. You can use curl or wget to dump them to a
file.

By looking at the statistics file (it's available as XML and JSON), we
can see if any memory contexts grow large and that could point to where
this large amount of memory is being used.

Also, did you use a max-cache-size option when running the above named?

Mukund

With earlier Freebsd 10 and bind 9.10, max-cache didn't limit the growth in named memory size.

named.conf sent privately.

I'll work on your other points.

Len







_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to