Re: A record of domain name must be name server ?

2014-09-09 Thread Pete Fong
Hi, xxx.com and IP address 192.168.1.100 is just a example domain name and IP address. Our boss want everybody access our domain example.com through browser, then it will redirect to our web site www.example.com. So I want to get more information about unexpected impact when we changed DNS records

Re: A record of domain name must be name server ?

2014-09-09 Thread Pete Fong
Hi Kevin, Thanks for your help. Do not worry. The IP address 192.168.1.100 is just for example. Best Regards, Pete Fong 2014-09-09 3:30 GMT+08:00 Kevin Darcy : > Based on the zone contents below, you shouldn't have any problem > changing the 192.168.1.100 address to anything you want. > > But

Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?

2014-09-09 Thread staticsafe
On 9/9/2014 23:17, Len Conrad wrote: > > cat /usr/local/bin/bind_rss_history.sh > > #!/bin/sh > touch /var/tmp/bind_rss_history.txt > > RSS=`ps auxw | awk '/^bind.*named/{print $6}'` > > NOW=`date "+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"` > > echo "$NOW $RSS" | awk '{printf "%10s%10s%11s\n",$1,$2,$3}' >> > /va

Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?

2014-09-09 Thread Len Conrad
At 09:40 PM 9/9/2014, you wrote: >On 9/9/2014 05:05, lcon...@go2france.com wrote: >> freebsd 10.0, bind-9.10.0-p2 >> >> logging the rss field for named process: >> >> >> less /var/tmp/bind_rss_history.txt >> >> This never happened with earlier BIND9, and our mx1 uses this recursive >> BIND mach

Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?

2014-09-09 Thread staticsafe
On 9/9/2014 05:05, lcon...@go2france.com wrote: > freebsd 10.0, bind-9.10.0-p2 > > logging the rss field for named process: > > > less /var/tmp/bind_rss_history.txt > > This never happened with earlier BIND9, and our mx1 uses this recursive > BIND machine for all domain/ptr lookups > > I've n

Re: Two domains reporting errors

2014-09-09 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , LuKreme writes: > On 09 Sep 2014, at 19:42 , LuKreme wrote: > > # named-checkconf -z | grep -v loaded > > Never mind. I recreated the files from scratch and the errors went away. Which, presumably, is because all the records have relative names. You still need to fix named.conf be

Re: Two domains reporting errors

2014-09-09 Thread LuKreme
On 09 Sep 2014, at 19:42 , LuKreme wrote: > # named-checkconf -z | grep -v loaded Never mind. I recreated the files from scratch and the errors went away. -- I DID NOT SEE ELVIS Bart chalkboard Ep. 7G07 ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailma

Re: Two domains reporting errors

2014-09-09 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <3cadc2fc-7338-4ac0-a6a2-c1aac48cb...@kreme.com>, LuKreme writes: > # named-checkconf -z | grep -v loaded > master/bt.tld:3: ignoring out-of-zone data (bt.tld) > master/bt.tld:15: ignoring out-of-zone data (webdav.bt.tld) > _default/dw.tld/IN: bad zone > master/bt.tld:16: ignoring out-o

Two domains reporting errors

2014-09-09 Thread LuKreme
# named-checkconf -z | grep -v loaded master/bt.tld:3: ignoring out-of-zone data (bt.tld) master/bt.tld:15: ignoring out-of-zone data (webdav.bt.tld) _default/dw.tld/IN: bad zone master/bt.tld:16: ignoring out-of-zone data (www.bt.tld) zone dw.tld/IN: has 0 SOA records zone dw.tld/IN: has no NS rec

Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?

2014-09-09 Thread lconrad
___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?

2014-09-09 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
Do you guys have max-cache-size set? I didn't see it in the borderworlds named.conf. I've seen similar growth problems when testing 9.x before setting that (experiment at the time just to see what would happen, and confirmed this behavior). Set sensible resource limits based on available resourc

Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?

2014-09-09 Thread Vinícius Ferrão
I'm having the exactly same issue. Take a look at my post @ServerFault: http://serverfault.com/questions/616752/bind-9-10-constantly-killed-on-freebsd-10-0-with-out-of-swap-space Sent from my iPhone On 09/09/2014, at 11:15, "Thomas Schulz" wrote: >> Hello >> >> I recently upgraded my authorit

Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?

2014-09-09 Thread Thomas Schulz
> Hello > > I recently upgraded my authoritative nameservers to bind-9.10.0-P2 and > after a while one of them ended up using all its swap and the named > process got killed. The other servers are seeing similar behaviour, but > I restarted named on all of them to postpone further crashes. > >

bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?

2014-09-09 Thread Christian Laursen
Hello I recently upgraded my authoritative nameservers to bind-9.10.0-P2 and after a while one of them ended up using all its swap and the named process got killed. The other servers are seeing similar behaviour, but I restarted named on all of them to postpone further crashes. I am using ra