I'm having the exactly same issue. Take a look at my post @ServerFault: http://serverfault.com/questions/616752/bind-9-10-constantly-killed-on-freebsd-10-0-with-out-of-swap-space
Sent from my iPhone On 09/09/2014, at 11:15, "Thomas Schulz" <sch...@adi.com> wrote: >> Hello >> >> I recently upgraded my authoritative nameservers to bind-9.10.0-P2 and >> after a while one of them ended up using all its swap and the named >> process got killed. The other servers are seeing similar behaviour, but >> I restarted named on all of them to postpone further crashes. >> >> I am using rate-limiting as well DLZ with PostgreSQL. The server has two >> views. The operating system is FreeBSD 8.4. >> >> My configuration: >> http://borderworlds.dk/~xi/named-leak/named.conf >> >> Log of the memory usage: >> http://borderworlds.dk/~xi/named-leak/named-mem-usage.log >> >> As you can see, in less than a week, named has grown more than 900MB in >> size. >> >> Is anyone else experiencing something similar? >> >> If I need to provide more information, I will be happy to do so. >> >> -- >> Christian Laursen > > What version did you upgrade from? I am seeing bind 9.9.5 and 9.9.6 > grow without any evidence that it will ever stop. See my mail to this > list with the subject "Re: Process size versus cache size." Mine is > growing slower than yours, but it is now up to 548 MB. > > Tom Schulz > Applied Dynamics Intl. > sch...@adi.com > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
