Hello Larry,
I had the same "head-ache" when I upgraded to 10.9. It seems that instead going
forward we all took a step behind. I guess this type of free stuff does come
with something attached to it. Anyways, when you upgraded to 10.9 the boot
files were wipe clean from the /System/Library/Lau
Question in better format.
Original Message
Subject: transfer signed zone
From:
Date: Fri, January 17, 2014 6:49 pm
To: bind-us...@isc.org
Receiving the following lines when transferring from a non-BIND server.
Is there a way to identify the "extra input data"?
Jan 17 17:16
Background: I have been using my Macintosh as a server running the client
version of OS X (not OS X Server) for many years. Until 10.9 (Mavericks), Apple
provided BIND and it worked just fine. My servers were internal only providing
behind-NAT local addresses for the local network as well as cac
Receiving the following lines when transferring from a non-BIND server. Is there a way to identify the "extra input data"?Jan 17 17:16:35 had4 named[6497]: runningJan 17 17:16:35 had4 named[6497]: zone example.com/IN: Transfer started.Jan 17 17:16:35 had4 named[6497]: transfer of 'example.com/IN' f
On 17/01/14 14:22, Rich Goodson wrote:
> You need a rate-limit log stanza to see rate limiting information
(rate limiting from IP address, no longer
> limiting from IP address, etc), and the individual queries that are
not responded to are logged either in
> your querylog or query-errors (can’
John,
"log-only yes;"
is the reason you are not seeing any rate limiting. You are telling your
server not to actually do any rate limiting, just to log what it would have
done. You didn’t post any more of your named.conf, but I would assume you
don’t have any logging set up for rate limiting
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:34:00PM +,
John Horne wrote
a message of 40 lines which said:
> log-only yes;
>From the ARM:
Use log-only yes to test rate limiting parameters
without actually dropping any requests.
> I get 10 correct responses.
It makes sense.
Hello,
I have BIND 9.9.4 installed on a server, and have included in the global
options:
rate-limit { responses-per-second 5;
log-only yes;
};
However, if I run from a client:
for n in `seq 1 10`; do dig +short jhorne.csd.plymouth.ac.uk a
@1
8 matches
Mail list logo
