Re: How does it work, if I don't give the named.ca information for cache only dns server

2013-08-10 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Sury Bu wrote: > Can anyone who can tell me How the cache server can query without given > named.ca? BIND has a default list of root servers built into the code. These are used if no "type hint" zone is in the named.conf. -- Barry Margolin Arlington, MA _

How does it work, if I don't give the named.ca information for cache only dns server

2013-08-10 Thread Sury Bu
Hi All, I have installed bind-9.8.2-0.17.rc1.el6_4.5.x86_64 on CentOS 6.3, and the bind-chroot package is not installed. Here is my /etc/named.conf options { listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; }; # listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; }; directory "/var/named"; dump-file

Re: Reverse Records on a leash?

2013-08-10 Thread Novosielski, Ryan
No -- and it's not BIND, it's the DNS spec. Reverse entries are in the .in-addr.arpa domian, not your domain name. - Original Message - From: Eduardo Bonsi [mailto:beart...@pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2013 01:26 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Reverse Records o

Re: Reverse Records on a leash?

2013-08-10 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Steven Carr wrote: > On 10 August 2013 18:26, Eduardo Bonsi wrote: > > Why should we be subjected to the ISP for reverse when we already have a > > static ip and are paying for the internet account, that by the way it is > not > > cheap or catered to small busin

Re: Reverse Records on a leash?

2013-08-10 Thread Steven Carr
On 10 August 2013 18:26, Eduardo Bonsi wrote: > Why should we be subjected to the ISP for reverse when we already have a > static ip and are paying for the internet account, that by the way it is not > cheap or catered to small business? Simple answer... the ISP is the owner of the IP address spa

Re: Reverse Records on a leash?

2013-08-10 Thread Eduardo Bonsi
On 8/10/13 3:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 09.08.13 17:44, Eduardo Bonsi wrote: I would like to know why we are treat like a dog on a leash when the question is to reverse our DNS ip address to a FQDN of our choices since our account is already assigned to us by our ISP? i don't unde

Re: Reverse Records on a leash?

2013-08-10 Thread Steven Carr
On 10 August 2013 01:44, Eduardo Bonsi wrote: > I would like to know why we are treat like a dog on a leash when the > question is to reverse our DNS ip address to a FQDN of our choices since our > account is already assigned to us by our ISP? I would guess that for the most part ISPs provide a p

Re: Reverse Records on a leash?

2013-08-10 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 09.08.13 17:44, Eduardo Bonsi wrote: I would like to know why we are treat like a dog on a leash when the question is to reverse our DNS ip address to a FQDN of our choices since our account is already assigned to us by our ISP? i don't understand your question. 000.000.000.000.in-addr.ar