In message , Barry Mar
golin writes:
> In article ,
> "Barry S. Finkel" wrote:
>
> > > HI Lawrence,
> > >
> > > We have recursive / caching name server for our Broadband internet
> > > services. And we have 60-40 traffic ratio. I mean 60 % queries comes
> > > on primary and 40% on secondary.
>
In article ,
"Barry S. Finkel" wrote:
> > HI Lawrence,
> >
> > We have recursive / caching name server for our Broadband internet
> > services. And we have 60-40 traffic ratio. I mean 60 % queries comes
> > on primary and 40% on secondary.
> >
> > Why primary does not getting 100% ?
> >
> > Is t
On 08/02/13 18:07, Jack Tavares wrote:
I have been using libbind(6.0) to do dynamic updates via
res_mkupdate()
Out of curiosity, is there any reason not to port the code to something
running in a higher-level language (or wrapper/script "nsupdate"?)
FWIW we use dns-python for this.
_
I have been using libbind(6.0) to do dynamic updates via
res_mkupdate()
libbind is not currently under development.
Is there are replacement in bind9 that I should move to?
I see the LWRES but that does not appear to have any update support.
Thank you
--
Jack Tavares
_
HI Lawrence,
We have recursive / caching name server for our Broadband internet
services. And we have 60-40 traffic ratio. I mean 60 % queries comes
on primary and 40% on secondary.
Why primary does not getting 100% ?
Is there any way to do it ? or what is the reason behind it that both
servers
On 2/8/2013 10:44 AM, Matt wrote:
Also, is there a way to specify a backup parent NS
and ONLY use it if primary fails?
Do you mean "NS" here? Or "forwarder"? I know of no way to manually
"preference" the forwarders in a list, although you might find that the
forwarder that responds fastest -- an
>> Also, is there a way to specify a backup parent NS
>> and ONLY use it if primary fails?
>
> Do you mean "NS" here? Or "forwarder"? I know of no way to manually
> "preference" the forwarders in a list, although you might find that the
> forwarder that responds fastest -- and thus gets automatical
On 08.02.13 20:01, benjamin fernandis wrote:
We have recursive / caching name server for our Broadband internet
services. And we have 60-40 traffic ratio. I mean 60 % queries comes
on primary and 40% on secondary.
Why primary does not getting 100% ?
Is there any way to do it ? or what is the re
Augie,
On Monday, 2013-02-04 19:01:38 -0600,
"Jeremy C. Reed" wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Augie Schwer wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have any experience using a large ( 1k ) entry ACL list?
> > Was there any performance degradation?
> >
> > I haven't implemented my ACL yet, but it has quickly ball
Casey,
Lots of good questions :).
Many zones on the servers. Just comparing total query count for all domains for
which they are auth servers.
They are almost identical in every way although I can see a slight possibility
that ns2 has a bit slower network connection.
Yup, the names of the ser
They are authoritative nameservers.
Thanks for the reply!
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:12:51 -0500
From: lkc...@ksu.edu
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: question about dns query distribution
Are these authoritative nameservers or resolving DNS servers?
If the latter, its probably because
11 matches
Mail list logo