In article <mailman.1259.1360341660.11945.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, "Barry S. Finkel" <bsfin...@att.net> wrote:
> > HI Lawrence, > > > > We have recursive / caching name server for our Broadband internet > > services. And we have 60-40 traffic ratio. I mean 60 % queries comes > > on primary and 40% on secondary. > > > > Why primary does not getting 100% ? > > > > Is there any way to do it ? or what is the reason behind it that both > > servers' having queries ? > > > > BR > > Ben > > In DNS there is no concept of a "primary" and "secondary" name server. > All of the name servers listed in the NS records for a zone are equal, > and any can be used to handle a DNS query (assuming, of course, that > each server has the zone properly configured). BIND will use the server > that has the shortest response time, but I do not know what other DNS > implementations do. His question is about a caching NS, not the authoritative servers listed in NS records. So the distribution is dependent on how client resolvers behave, not how other BIND servers operate. -- Barry Margolin Arlington, MA _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
