In message
, Casey Deccio writes:
> --0016e6408196cd44f804af0ccabe
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > To answer the original poster's question. Use TSIG as has already
> > been pointed out. The following change makes
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> To answer the original poster's question. Use TSIG as has already
> been pointed out. The following change makes doing this much easier
> as it allows you to send to multiple views by having multiple
> address/key pairs specified in also-no
>Bad decision on the deployment option, IMO. Not sure even what you mean
>by "removed", since it's deeply integrated into all modern networking
>stacks. Either you severely crippled your networking subsystem, or it's
>not as "removed" as you were told it was.
Disabled with all the correct measures
In message <4e94ab4f.9020...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes:
> On 10/11/2011 4:05 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >> If one view or the other communicates exclusively with other devices on
> >> the same link, you could probably get away with using an IPv6 link-local
> >> address, which is likely
On 10/11/2011 4:05 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
If one view or the other communicates exclusively with other devices on
the same link, you could probably get away with using an IPv6 link-local
address, which is likely already present on your system (if you're
running a modern OS), and is probably
>If one view or the other communicates exclusively with other devices on
>the same link, you could probably get away with using an IPv6 link-local
>address, which is likely already present on your system (if you're
>running a modern OS), and is probably "invisible" to the other apps
>you're running
On 10/11/2011 1:45 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What do you mean you can’t have additional IPs? Even if you don’t
have other network connections you can use virtual IPs on a single
NIC. I have one server (not DNS) that has 30 virtual IPs on a single NIC.
Well, there is other software I was ho
>What do you mean you can’t have additional IPs? Even if you don’t
>have other network connections you can use virtual IPs on a single
>NIC. I have one server (not DNS) that has 30 virtual IPs on a single NIC.
Well, there is other software I was hoping to avoid reconfiguring if I add a
virtual
sure with tsig keys.
在 2011-10-11 下午9:23，"Joseph L. Casale" 写道：
> I have an RHEL server running Bind 9.7 that needs to have a zone set to
> master and
>
> slave between two views. I don’t have the luxury of an additional IP, is
> this still possible
>
> with a single ip address?
>
> *
What do you mean you can’t have additional IPs? Even if you don’t have other
network connections you can use virtual IPs on a single NIC. I have one
server (not DNS) that has 30 virtual IPs on a single NIC.
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@li
I have an RHEL server running Bind 9.7 that needs to have a zone set to master
and
slave between two views. I don't have the luxury of an additional IP, is this
still possible
with a single ip address?
Thanks!
jlc
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org
On Oct 7 2011, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 10/07/2011 06:43 PM, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
Maybe an off topic in this thread, but out of curiosity, is there any
specific reason you don't use the database as the direct source of the
zone with BIND 9's dlz or PowerDNS? In general it will be slower,
12 matches
Mail list logo
