On 2011-09-07, at 11:11 AM, michoski wrote:
> On 9/7/11 10:02 AM, "michoski" wrote:
>> I'm guessing the BIND upgrade caused your startup script, named.conf
>> location,
>> or something critical to change location...
>>
>> Cliché I know, but there are good pointers on Google:
>>
>> http://is.gd
On 9/6/2011 8:40 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message<4e66b5b5.30...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes:
On 9/1/2011 7:57 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message<4e5fb1ab.4040...@data.pl>, Torinthiel writes:
On 09/01/11 17:56, Tom Schmitt wrote:
=20
I found the cause of my problem (and a solution):
=
> I am getting an undefined reference error when running make on
> bind-9.8.1. Error message at bottom.
Yes, sorry about that -- known bug, will be fixed in 9.8.2. Here's a
patch:
Index: contrib/dlz/drivers/sdlz_helper.c
===
RCS
Why are you trying to use the SRAA for DNS resolution? SRAA has a
special meaning to network-infrastructure devices; I don't think it was
ever intended for anycasting general network services. Just pick one of
your global-unicast address, and anycast that instead.
There was an old Internet-Dra
Thanks, Alan.
So, I'm looking for the stats under the "Server Statistics" section if I
want the same stats that <9.5 BIND produced, correct?
Thanks,
Josh
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jbaird=follett@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jbaird=follett@lists.isc.
At Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:13:28 -0500,
"Baird, Josh" wrote:
> Just upgraded some authoritative boxes to RHEL6, thus upgrading to BIND
> 9.7.3. On RHEL5 (BIND 9.3.x), I had scripts that parsed the output of
> the named.stats file, and piped them through net-snmpd so my NMS could
> monitor query stati
On 9/7/2011 11:13 AM, Baird, Josh wrote:
> Is there a way to revert back to the old stats format? Is there an
> easier way to reveal query stats via SNMP in 9.7? Any recommendations?
> I'm really looking to get QPS statistics. I can modify my parser script
> if necessary, but I thought I would c
On 9/7/11 9:39 AM, "Norman Fournier" wrote:
> I was running BIND successfully on OS X 10.4 Tiger. That webserver crashed and
> I replaced it with a new cpu and installed OS X 10.5 Leopard and have
> encountered a number of errors in my configuration. This is the latest error
> from the old config
On 9/7/11 10:02 AM, "michoski" wrote:
> I'm guessing the BIND upgrade caused your startup script, named.conf location,
> or something critical to change location...
>
> Cliché I know, but there are good pointers on Google:
>
> http://is.gd/create.php
Apologies,
For the record, URL shorteners w
I am getting an undefined reference error when running make on
bind-9.8.1. Error message at bottom.
|export CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/lib64/mysql $CPPFLAGS"
export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib64/mysql $LDFLAGS"
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/usr/lib64/mysql"
|# ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/bind --disable-openssl-v
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:39:30AM -0600, Norman Fournier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was running BIND successfully on OS X 10.4 Tiger. That webserver crashed
> and I replaced it with a new cpu and installed OS X 10.5 Leopard and have
> encountered a number of errors in my configuration. This is the l
Hello,
I was running BIND successfully on OS X 10.4 Tiger. That webserver crashed and
I replaced it with a new cpu and installed OS X 10.5 Leopard and have
encountered a number of errors in my configuration. This is the latest error
from the old config files. Any suggestions or pointers as to w
All,
Just upgraded some authoritative boxes to RHEL6, thus upgrading to BIND
9.7.3. On RHEL5 (BIND 9.3.x), I had scripts that parsed the output of
the named.stats file, and piped them through net-snmpd so my NMS could
monitor query statistics. On 9.3.x, the named.stats looked like:
+++ Statisti
Hello,
I send with DiG 9.7.3 a request to a router/DNS forwarder with the
Subnet-Router anycast address of the router (SRAA, RFC 2373, § 2.6.1).
The answer is :
reply from unexpected source: #53, expected #53
Is there an option to relax the IPv6 address request/reply control for this use
case
On Wed Sep 07 2011 at 12:54:31 CEST, Chris Thompson wrote:
> >Named doesn't yet have the ability to disable DNSSEC validation
> >for specified namespaces.
>
> "Yet"? Is there a hint of a future change there?
*Please* say yes.
-JP
___
Please v
On Sep 6 2011, Mark Andrews wrote:
[...]
Named doesn't yet have the ability to disable DNSSEC validation
for specified namespaces.
"Yet"? Is there a hint of a future change there?
--
Chris Thompson
Email: c...@cam.ac.uk
___
Please visit https://lists
16 matches
Mail list logo