Why are you trying to use the SRAA for DNS resolution? SRAA has a special meaning to network-infrastructure devices; I don't think it was ever intended for anycasting general network services. Just pick one of your global-unicast address, and anycast that instead.

There was an old Internet-Draft specifying common *site-local* addresses for DNS resolvers, but that draft expired many years ago, and since site-local itself has been deprecated, could be considered doubly obsolete. (Although I still see those fec0:* addresses appended to the resolver list on a Windows XP PC with IPv6 enabled).

Note that RFC 4291 obsoletes RFC 3513 which obsoletes RFC 2373.


- Kevin


On 9/7/2011 10:48 AM, François-Xavier Le Bail wrote:
Hello,

I send with DiG 9.7.3 a request to a router/DNS forwarder with the 
Subnet-Router anycast address of the router (SRAA, RFC 2373, § 2.6.1).

The answer is :
reply from unexpected source:<GUA of the router>#53, expected<SRAA>#53

Is there an option to relax the IPv6 address request/reply control for this use 
case ?

Best regards,
François-Xavier Le Bail

-----Message d'origine-----
De : LE BAIL Francois-Xavier RD-RESA-LAN
Envoyé : mercredi 7 septembre 2011 16:29
À : LE BAIL Francois-Xavier RD-RESA-LAN
Objet : DiG&  subnet-anycast router address

DiG 9.7.3

;; reply from unexpected source: 2001:1:1:100:209:a9ff:fe13:1500#53, expected 
2001:1:1:100::#53

_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users






_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to