On 22/11/10 5:05 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/21/2010 21:58, Ben McGinnes wrote:
>> On 22/11/10 7:12 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, CT wrote:
>>>
- BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
>>>
>>> Really old, definitely needs upgrading.
>>
>> That just means they're running R
On 11/21/2010 21:58, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 22/11/10 7:12 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, CT wrote:
- BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
Really old, definitely needs upgrading.
That just means they're running RHEL 5 or CentOS 5. If they have a
support contract with Red Ha
On 22/11/10 7:12 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, CT wrote:
>
>> - BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
>
> Really old, definitely needs upgrading.
That just means they're running RHEL 5 or CentOS 5. If they have a
support contract with Red Hat, they may not be able to upgrade w
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:49:35PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Carlos Vicente wrote:
>> Has anybody had this problem?
>> # /etc/init.d/named restart
>> Stopping named: . [FAILED]
>> Starting named: named: already running
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Carlos Vicente wrote:
Has anybody had this problem?
# /etc/init.d/named restart
Stopping named: . [FAILED]
Starting named: named: already running [ OK ]
Not sure what mechanism your linux distro is using, but
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Jack Tavares wrote:
I am currently using libbind to do dynamic updates in "C".
I have looked in the bind 9.7.x source and I don't see a replacement mechanism
for this.
libbind is now its own package, separate from the BIND sources. Look
carefully on the ISC web page und
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Gary Wallis wrote:
(If we use FOSS BIND why should we support anti FOSS businesses like many
mentioned above?)
Because business is business, and using the right tool for the job is
more important than adhering to the purity of an ideology developed in
the absence of real
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, CT wrote:
I am looking for a best practices for dns query logging
This is an area where "best practices" are really in the eye of the
beholder. If you believe that there may be utility for your site in
doing this, give it a try. :) My advice is that you enable it on a
+1
The FreeBSD base system BIND is there primarily to provide a local
resolver. In the event that you are doing more serious DNS work (such as
authoritative DNS, a resolver for the local network, etc.) the
expectation is that you will update to a more recent version of BIND.
Using the ports t
I was wondering if it's possible to return a "catchall" A record for
domains which bind can't resolve?
I'm able to configure a "catchall" bind configuration where bind would
return the same A record for all queries; but I'd rather it returns it
for domains it can't resolve.
--
Tomasz Chmiel
10 matches
Mail list logo
