On 22/11/10 5:05 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 11/21/2010 21:58, Ben McGinnes wrote: >> On 22/11/10 7:12 AM, Doug Barton wrote: >>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, CT wrote: >>> >>>> - BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 >>> >>> Really old, definitely needs upgrading. >> >> That just means they're running RHEL 5 or CentOS 5. If they have a >> support contract with Red Hat, they may not be able to upgrade >> without forfeiting their support and/or certification. That >> version will include back-ported security fixes. > > I get that actually. However it doesn't change my recommendation. > Even with security patches BIND 9.3 is past EOL, and incapable of > doing modern DNSSEC.
Fair enough. Red Hat probably need to find a middle ground for proper updates of certain essential packages, like BIND, while working within their upgrade path. That, however, is a topic for another list. Regards, Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
