In message <4c89fcd5.4050...@paz.bz>, Jim Pazarena writes:
> I am curious if anyone can point out articles or deeper instructions
> regarding an implementation and launch of ipv6 in a fully ipv4 camp?
>
> If the upstream ISP still provides the end user an ipv4 number
> as a gateway, and the end u
On Sep 12, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> I could not get private stub nor forward zones to work if their public parent
> is signed and does not have a delegation to the private zone.
Does it work if the parent does have a DS record for the child covered by the
stub zone? I would expect
I could not get private stub nor forward zones to work if their public parent
is signed and does not have a delegation to the private zone.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
On 12 Sep 2010, at 03:41, Chris Buxton wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2010, at 2:34 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
>>
>> Y
Chris Buxton wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Lyle Giese wrote:
>
>
>> wllarso wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not any sort of Linux expert but this started my mind thinking.
>>>
>>> Take a look at the BIND FAQ, it comes with the sources. There are some
>>> Linux specific comments about file and dir
On 09/12/2010 03:41 AM, Chris Buxton wrote:
Use a stub zone instead of a forward zone, so that the query will
actually reach the authoritative view. With a forward zone, the query
is recursive, so will be picked up by the recursive view - the view
will query itself and not receive an answer.
O
5 matches
Mail list logo
