Re: Can an NS point to a CNAME

2010-08-12 Thread Phil Mayers
On 12/08/10 16:34, Yohann Lepage wrote: 2010/8/12 Phil Mayers: Is this still the case (that NS->CNAME is invalid)? http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2181.txt 10.3. MX and NS records The domain name used as the value of a NS resource record, or part of the value of a MX resource record

Re: Can an NS point to a CNAME

2010-08-12 Thread Yohann Lepage
2010/8/12 Phil Mayers : > Is this still the case (that NS->CNAME is invalid)? http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2181.txt 10.3. MX and NS records The domain name used as the value of a NS resource record, or part of the value of a MX resource record must not be an alias. Not only is the

Re: Can an NS point to a CNAME

2010-08-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12.08.10 12:02, Phil Mayers wrote: > We've had a report this morning that a user can't resolve: > > 71.225.219.134.in-addr.arpa PTR > > ...I think this is because the parent zone NS records point to CNAMEs. I > can see references to (much) older versions of bind not following such > delegati

Can an NS point to a CNAME

2010-08-12 Thread Phil Mayers
All, We've had a report this morning that a user can't resolve: 71.225.219.134.in-addr.arpa PTR ...I think this is because the parent zone NS records point to CNAMEs. I can see references to (much) older versions of bind not following such delegations, but I'm not getting anything logged at t

Re: new IPs for our name servers problems

2010-08-12 Thread Michael Dilworth
many thanks to all for your help mike 2010/8/12 Torsten > Am Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:58:54 +0300 > schrieb Michael Dilworth : > > > hi > > > > many thanks for the help and apologies for my ignorance. The parent > > zone here would be the .com ? how does one go about updating the > > delegation in

Re: new IPs for our name servers problems

2010-08-12 Thread Torsten
Am Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:58:54 +0300 schrieb Michael Dilworth : > hi > > many thanks for the help and apologies for my ignorance. The parent > zone here would be the .com ? how does one go about updating the > delegation in this? > > mike You need to contact your registrar (Register.com) to do th

Re: new IPs for our name servers problems

2010-08-12 Thread Michael Dilworth
hi many thanks for the help and apologies for my ignorance. The parent zone here would be the .com ? how does one go about updating the delegation in this? mike On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 12.08.10 12:40, Michael Dilworth wrote: > > We are in the proces

Re: new IPs for our name servers problems

2010-08-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12.08.10 12:40, Michael Dilworth wrote: > We are in the process of moving our address space from a PA block to a PI > block. This means I have had to use 2 new IPs for our name servers. > > the old address space was 89.221.36.0/24 and the new address space is > 91.213.52.0/24 > > the old name

new IPs for our name servers problems

2010-08-12 Thread Michael Dilworth
hi all i am wondering if anyone can help because I am a little stuck with this one. We are in the process of moving our address space from a PA block to a PI block. This means I have had to use 2 new IPs for our name servers. the old address space was 89.221.36.0/24 and the new address space is

Re: mem.c:1093: INSIST(ctx->stats[i].gets == 0U) failed

2010-08-12 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/11/2010 13:43, Carlos Vicente wrote: > One of our recursive resolvers, running 9.7.0-P2 You're a minor version and 2 patches behind the times. Download 9.7.1-P2, and while it's compiling read the Changelog to see if anything there applies. Worst case scenario is that you reproduce the bug bu