I'm using bind 9.7.0-p2 as an authoritive/caching server on a couple of
servers and lately I'm noticing that we're having problems resolving
domains under *.domaincontrol.com servers. The query itself is sent out
(as the tcpdump output down below shows) but only a couple of replies
get back. In
In article ,
Christophe Lermytte wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to find out what the server behavior should be in the following
> situation:
>
> client -> server1 -> server2
>
> client asks server1 to recursively resolve a name
> server1 does not know and asks server2
> server2 sends an ICMP
On 6/16/2010 10:44 AM, Niobos wrote:
In this configuration, the server's IP is present multiple times, which
will lead to mistakes in the future. I can't let the SRV-record point
directly to "server" either, since the vhost-configuration needs the
correct Host:-HTTP header.
Or am I missing som
BIND 9.7.1 is now available.
BIND 9.7.1 is a maintenance release for BIND 9.7.
BIND 9.7.1 can be downloaded from
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.1/bind-9.7.1.tar.gz
The PGP signature of the distribution is at
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.1/bind-9.7
This is to say the limitation is the 32 bit not the Solaris. You have
the same limit in HP-UX 32 bit, Linux 32 bit etc...
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf
Of Stacey Jonatha
Hello,
I'm trying to find out what the server behavior should be in the following
situation:
client -> server1 -> server2
client asks server1 to recursively resolve a name
server1 does not know and asks server2
server2 sends an ICMP Port Unreachable to server1
Is there something server1 can
Yes mine is also 32 bit. So is it confirmed that the 4GB memory limit on 32 bit
processes on Solaris 10?
Prabhat.
Yes, a 32bit process can only access up-to 4gb of memory.
$ echo 2^32 / 1024 / 1024 / 1024 | bc -l
4.
I believe BIND has some options (named.conf) to
7 matches
Mail list logo
