In article ,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 28.04.10 16:55, Chris C wrote:
> > This instance is used as a caching resolver with blacklists. The
> > blacklists are fed what is basically a null.zone file.
>
> how do you implement blacklists? show me example of one blacklisted zone
> configur
In message , Alm
ond d writes:
> Hi,
>
> When I am using multi-threaded application, sometimes I get
> message "memcluster.c:436: INSIST(stats[size].gets != 0U) failed." in bind9.
memcluster.c is part of libbind. It's not really part of BIND 9 and
is now a seperate project.
I would take this t
In message , "ic.nssip" writ
es:
> Hi Mark,
>
> All my DNS Servers running BIND 9.6.1 are resolving/accepting lame servers
> answers.
> The only ones I can't get to provide a response coming from a lame server
> are the servers running BIND 9.7.0.
> Is there any work around to make 9.7.0 to acc
We have a Bind 9.7.0-P1 instance that is throwing the following errors:
21-Apr-2010 16:59:00.173 general: error: socket: file descriptor exceeds
limit
(1024/1024)
21-Apr-2010 17:00:00.122 general: error: socket: file descriptor exceeds
limit
(1024/1024)
21-Apr-2010 17:00:00.123 general: error:
On 4/29/2010 7:37 PM, Almond d wrote:
> I am using bind-9.3.1.
[[..]]
> Can anybody please tell me what is the solution to this problem?
Yes. Upgrade.
AlanC
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-user
Hi,
When I am using multi-threaded application, sometimes I get
message "memcluster.c:436: INSIST(stats[size].gets != 0U) failed." in bind9.
I am using bind-9.3.1.
I have searched a lot on this but didn't get any pointer to the solution of
this problem. I also see that same issue was discussed som
Hi Mark,
All my DNS Servers running BIND 9.6.1 are resolving/accepting lame servers
answers.
The only ones I can't get to provide a response coming from a lame server
are the servers running BIND 9.7.0.
Is there any work around to make 9.7.0 to accept the response coming from a
lame server?
Ri
Delegation is not in order as I see it:
$ dig ns letharion.se
; <<>> DiG 9.6.0-APPLE-P2 <<>> ns letharion.se
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 25863
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; QUESTION SECTION:
I wrote on April 16:
>I did some timings with BIND 9.6.1-P3 and 9.7.0-P1 on two servers:
>
> SunOS 5.9 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1500 (old hardware)
> Ubuntu hardy x86_64 GNU/Linux (more modern hardware)
>
>I had noticed long times for "rndc reload" to complete, and I wanted
On Apr 29 2010, Torsten wrote:
Am Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:33:37 +0200
schrieb Claes Gyllenswärd :
[...]
2) Glue for DNS-server ns1.letharion.se differs between child and
parent zone. This is a configuration problem that should be corrected.
According to the .se nameservers the authoritative Name
In message <7a3585b6892549319c6942b1fd94d...@internal.corp.ds>, "ic.nssip" writ
es:
> Hi Mark,
>
> What is the reason for rejecting non-autoritative answers?
A server that is configured to serve the zone and has loaded it
cleanly sets AA. If you don't get aa then the server is lame or
it doesn'
Am Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:33:37 +0200
schrieb Claes Gyllenswärd :
> Hello bind-users
>
> I have recently set up my first two BIND-instances, and I believe that
> I have gotten things nearly right, but something is amiss.
> "Internetstiftelsen", handles the TLD .se, and they have a self-test
> one ca
Hello bind-users
I have recently set up my first two BIND-instances, and I believe that
I have gotten things nearly right, but something is amiss.
"Internetstiftelsen", handles the TLD .se, and they have a self-test
one can run on ones DNS's before actually using them. Running this
test, it return
13 matches
Mail list logo
