On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:43 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <402431.44413...@web112611.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>, gmspro writes:
>> What's the main difference between zone and domain?
>> It's confusing to me,I'm searching though,i got once,"zone is a portion of do
>> main".
>>
>> Can someone give exam
In message <402431.44413...@web112611.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>, gmspro writes:
> What's the main difference between zone and domain?
> It's confusing to me,I'm searching though,i got once,"zone is a portion of do
> main".
>
> Can someone give example to clear things up?
example.net.SOA ns.example
What's the main difference between zone and domain?
It's confusing to me,I'm searching though,i got once,"zone is a portion of
domain".
Can someone give example to clear things up?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://l
At 23:19 30/11/2009, Kevin Darcy wrote:
It appears that the default view is locked to class IN, so if you
need a zone in another class, you need to define a view, even if
trivially defined:
options {
directory "/tmp";
};
view "blah" class999 {
match-clients { any; };
zone "foo" class999 {
ty
People who can read man pages can certainly read emails :-)
He was running named-checkconf, not named-checkzone.
It appears that the default view is locked to class IN, so if you need a
zone in another class, you need to define a view, even if trivially defined:
options {
directory "/tmp";
};
In message <20091130214313.9fff2114...@mx.isc.org>, JFC Morfin writes:
> At 19:36 30/11/2009, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > I understand that. But I need to use Private Use classes. The question
> > > is how do I do it?
> >
> >Use CLASS999 and similar identifiers (just like TYPE999 for types).
>
>
JFC Morfin wrote:
At 19:36 30/11/2009, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I understand that. But I need to use Private Use classes. The question
> is how do I do it?
Use CLASS999 and similar identifiers (just like TYPE999 for types).
I guessed the format from the code. But it fails.
named-checkconf says
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:43:08PM +0100,
JFC Morfin wrote
a message of 15 lines which said:
> I guessed the format from the code. But it fails. named-checkconf
> says that "CLASS999 does not match view\default class"?
People who read the code can certainly read the man page:
-c clas
BIND 9.7.0b3 is now available.
BIND 9.7.0b3 is the third beta release of BIND 9.7.0.
Overview:
BIND 9.7 includes a number of changes from BIND 9.6 and earlier
releases. Most are intended to simplify DNSSEC configuration
and operation.
At 19:36 30/11/2009, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I understand that. But I need to use Private Use classes. The question
> is how do I do it?
Use CLASS999 and similar identifiers (just like TYPE999 for types).
I guessed the format from the code. But it fails.
named-checkconf says that "CLASS999 doe
> From: "Mike Bernhardt"
> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:19:44 -0800
> Sender: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
>
> Dumb question perhaps, but does this patch serve any purpose if one is not
> using DNSSEC?
Dumb answer: looks like it only effects you if you are doing
validation. If you sign your dat
Dumb question perhaps, but does this patch serve any purpose if one is not
using DNSSEC?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> I understand that. But I need to use Private Use classes. The question
> is how do I do it?
Use CLASS999 and similar identifiers (just like TYPE999 for types).
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/
At 18:32 30/11/2009, Kevin Darcy wrote:
The default CLASS is "IN" (Internet). Unless you have a specific
need to use another class, then just leave CLASS empty and "IN" will
cover all of your typical name-resolution functions, e.g.
name->address, address->name, mail-domain->mail-exchangers, etc
The default CLASS is "IN" (Internet). Unless you have a specific need to
use another class, then just leave CLASS empty and "IN" will cover all
of your typical name-resolution functions, e.g. name->address,
address->name, mail-domain->mail-exchangers, etc.
I made BIND work under windows. Now, I have some problem in finding
the proper configuration syntax for classes.
Cf. RFC 5395. http://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters
0xE000-0xFEFF
65280-65534Reserved for Private Use
Where is CLASS usage documented?
Thank you!
jfc
_
Mark,
thank you for this, it almost worked but put me on the right path.
In message <8761a2bbe915df46bb20e017c891e48ca...@ferrari.coherent.cohtech.co.uk
>, "Howard Wilkinson" writes:
> I am trying to build a package based on 9.6.1-P2. The target platform is a 32
> -bit ix86 environment. The bu
17 matches
Mail list logo
