In message , Sergio Ramirez writes:
> Hi,
>
>In the following example, the authoritive server for
> zone .xx has configured the delegations of the zones example.xx
> and otherexample.xx:
>
> example.xx NS ns1.example.xx
> example.xx NS ns2.example.xx
> ns1.example.xx A 11.22.33.44
> ns2
In message <1254502519.14277.16.ca...@dv6d4k1-u>, "Nicholas Wheeler" writes:
> On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 13:22 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > You really want to work out what is being blocked, EDNS?, responses
> > bigger that 512 bytes? DNSSEC? fragmented responses? With a clean
> > path all of these
Sergio Ramirez wrote:
> Thanks for the answer Ben, I agree.
> But the problem is if the administrator of zone example.xx
> decides to change the ip address of the ns3.example.xx and
> ns4.example.xx, the glue records will be wrong.
That's why is usually a good idea to use nameservers under the do
Thanks for the answer Ben, I agree.
But the problem is if the administrator of zone example.xx
decides to change the ip address of the ns3.example.xx and
ns4.example.xx, the glue records will be wrong.
--
Sergio R.
Ben Croswell escribió:
> I would imagine the answer will be that they aren't requi
I would imagine the answer will be that they aren't required but would be
helpful.
Since the parent .xx is delegating to the second-level domains, if you do
glue for all four DNS servers you are preventing a remote DNS server from
having to go to the servers for example.xx to get the A records for
Hi,
In the following example, the authoritive server for
zone .xx has configured the delegations of the zones example.xx
and otherexample.xx:
example.xx NS ns1.example.xx
example.xx NS ns2.example.xx
ns1.example.xx A 11.22.33.44
ns2.example.xx A 11.22.33.55
otherexample.xx NS ns3.example
Not to the list but just to you.
I could imagine a system having multiple views defined with only one view
that allows DDNS updates. The other views would be "read-only". This
wouldn't be pretty, but ...
In this one view that allows DDNS, you wouldn't be restricted to ONLY "A"
records. User
I take it this is not possible using update-policy?
_
Nicholas Miller, ITS, University of Colorado at Boulder
On Sep 30, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Nicholas F Miller wrote:
Is it possible to restrict user machines to only be able to update
thei
Le Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:42:47 +0100,
Stephane Bortzmeyer a écrit :
> Wild guess: the browser uses a proxy, which runs on 192.168.6.1. The
> proxy is doing name resolution (and uses 127.0.0.1, which is in the
> resolv.conf of its machine).
>
Indeed, there is a transparent squid proxy! Maybe squid
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Cyril Gaudin - Rodacom wrote:
> But in my browser, if I write http://myapplication/, the dns request
> failed.
>
> Here is the bind log (192.168.6.28 is my computer):
>
> queries: client 192.168.6.28#36728: query: myapplication.home.fr IN A +
> queries: client 127.0.0.1#5688
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 02:40:07PM +0200,
Cyril Gaudin - Rodacom wrote
a message of 139 lines which said:
> Sorry in advance for my very bad english!
There is a français mailing list: dns...@cru.fr
> And why there's a second request without the domain name?
Wild guess: the browser uses a pr
Hi,
Sorry in advance for my very bad english!
I have a question (problem?) with my Bind configuration.
My Bind server is on a Debian Lenny.
I'm on a local network with domainname "home.fr"
I wish to create shortcut name to access an internet application.
Example:
In my browser, if I wri
12 matches
Mail list logo
