Thanks for the answer Ben, I agree. But the problem is if the administrator of zone example.xx decides to change the ip address of the ns3.example.xx and ns4.example.xx, the glue records will be wrong. -- Sergio R.
Ben Croswell escribió: > I would imagine the answer will be that they aren't required but would > be helpful. > > Since the parent .xx is delegating to the second-level domains, if you > do glue for all four DNS servers you are preventing a remote DNS server > from having to go to the servers for example.xx to get the A records for > the DNS servers for otherexample.xx. > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Sergio Ramirez <srami...@seciu.edu.uy > <mailto:srami...@seciu.edu.uy>> wrote: > > Hi, > > In the following example, the authoritive server for > zone .xx has configured the delegations of the zones example.xx > and otherexample.xx: > > example.xx NS ns1.example.xx > example.xx NS ns2.example.xx > ns1.example.xx A 11.22.33.44 > ns2.example.xx A 11.22.33.55 > otherexample.xx NS ns3.example.xx > otherexample.xx NS ns4.example.xx > > the bind report these messages: > > "ns3.example.xx has no SIBLING GLUE address records (A or AAAA)" > "ns4.example.xx has no SIBLING GLUE address records (A or AAAA)" > > because the glue records are not configured in the zone .xx, for > ns3.example.xx and ns4.example.xx > > Are these glue records requiered ? > > I understand that is not. Is this right ? > > Regards, > -- > Sergio R. > _______________________________________________ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org <mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org> > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > > > > > -- > -Ben Croswell _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
