It is an ISP DNS, when they test the second DNS (advertised as secondary for
customers), when they test they noticed that it is a little bit slow when
opening same websites comparing to first DNS (primary), this happens only first
time they open the website then it will be fine (because caching)
In message <4a528a41.5000...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes:
> Michael Milligan wrote:
> > Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> >> In message <4a4dd8a6.70...@bluewin.ch>, "Martin.Wismer." writes:
> >>
> >>> Hello Mark, Hello Jittinan,
> >>>
> >>> thank you for informing us/me, that bluewin.ch sh
Michael Milligan wrote:
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <4a4dd8a6.70...@bluewin.ch>, "Martin.Wismer." writes:
Hello Mark, Hello Jittinan,
thank you for informing us/me, that bluewin.ch shod do some
improovements in our dns-settings.
Yes, the bluewin.ch is on 4 dns-bind-Server's, but
Bryan Irvine wrote:
Other than to really annoy me; is there a valid reason for rr rDNS?
Once upon a time, BIND specifically *disabled* round-robin behavior for
non-address (A/) record types. PTR RRsets, among other types, were
always given in a "fixed" order.
But, I just tried a quic
Other than to really annoy me; is there a valid reason for rr rDNS?
-Bryan
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote
(but my comment is for the OP, AlanS):
If the reason is due to client-side server
selection algorithm (many Unix based resolvers only uses the first
address in /etc/resolv.conf as long as it responds to their queries),
there's basically nothing you can do as the server
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 10:36:40PM -0700,
Shane W wrote
a message of 18 lines which said:
> Is there some sort of standardized way as yet to communicate key
> changes to an upstream zone or in this case a lookaside provider?
There is a standard registrar2registry interface, an extension of EP
7 matches
Mail list logo
