On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 14:09 -0600, David Forrest wrote:
> To get rid of all those "nice" log entries, I have this in my
> named.conf:
Thanks, David.
For now, they're not so frequent as to be a nuisance.
/Niall
___
bind-users ma
From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [jinmei_tat...@isc.org]
> I have downloaded libbind6.0b1
>
> My question is;
>
> the arpa/nameser.h file included does not include
> type definitions for DNSKEY (or other dnssec rr types)
> in the ns_type enum.
>
> am I looking in the wrong place?
> No, you're looking a
$ORIGIN .
@ 0 SOA ...
@ 0 NS ...
* 0 A 1.2.3.4
In message <499b8e5a.5010...@whgl.uni-frankfurt.de>, Sven Eschenberg writes:
> Dear list,
>
> I tried googling about a Catch-All setup for a DNS, with little success.
> I tried messing around with some zone/hint file
Dear list,
I tried googling about a Catch-All setup for a DNS, with little success.
I tried messing around with some zone/hint files in an isolated setup,
but without any success.
What I am trying to achieve is the following:
No matter which host/name is looked up, the DNS should spit out th
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:01:56AM -0800, Worrell, James J Mr CIV US DISA GS4T1
wrote:
> Thanks Ray! Any information would be greatly appreciated.
Applied the patch but ran into one "gotcha". The server wasn't
starting up properly after applyign the patch. I tried running the
binary in the for
https://www.arin.net/
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of The Doctor
Sent: Wednesday, 18 February 2009 10:48 AM
To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
Subject: Where to find Class Cs for sale or rent in North America
Anyone with pointers on this?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Never Satan President Republic!
Christian(n): A Jew that believe Christ is Messiah and Saviour and alive
--
This message has been sc
At Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:44:44 +0100,
"Chiesa Stefano" wrote:
> I just upgraded my Bind 9.4.2 to 9.6.0-P1 without changing anything in
> the named.conf file.
> Now my named.stats has changed in his structure from the short one:
[snip]
> Is there a way to come back to the first structure?
No with
At Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:15:39 -0500,
Matthew Huff wrote:
> 17-Feb-2009 08:14:17.376 queries: client 62.109.4.89#49464: view
> external-in: query: . IN NS +
> ...
>
> logged, and I have verified that the query is refused, but nothing in the
> log shows that it was refused. Is there anyway to log t
At Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:34:38 -0800,
Jack Tavares wrote:
> Any suggestions on this?
[snip]
> I have downloaded libbind6.0b1
>
> My question is;
>
> the arpa/nameser.h file included does not include
> type definitions for DNSKEY (or other dnssec rr types)
> in the ns_type enum.
>
> am I lookin
In message , Benedikt Gollatz writes:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I use nsupdate to dynamically update a reverse lookup zone hosted by my
> BIND9 setup. For that purpose, I've created host-type HMAC-MD5 keys,
> added an appropriate "key" section to my configuration, added the updating
> host to the
In message <20090217121007.91cf14e...@cork.irdesign.cypress.com>, Lars Hecking
writes:
>
> BIND 9.4.3-P1, Solaris 8
>
> I'm trying to get a chroot setup to work following the instructions here
> http://www.boran.com/security/sp/bind9_20010430.html
>
> # /usr/sbin/named -g -t /var/named/chr
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <1234867921.16690.43.ca...@d410-heron>, "Niall O'Reilly" writes:
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 12:17 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
It should be unrelated. I would however still upgrade.
Thanks, Mark.
If I don't see the same assertio
In message <1234867921.16690.43.ca...@d410-heron>, "Niall O'Reilly" writes:
> On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 12:17 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > It should be unrelated. I would however still upgrade.
>
> Thanks, Mark.
>
> If I don't see the same assertion failure with
> the current re
Hi all.
I just upgraded my Bind 9.4.2 to 9.6.0-P1 without changing anything in
the named.conf file.
Now my named.stats has changed in his structure from the short one:
+++ Statistics Dump +++ (1211013000)
success 664883
referral 127191
nxrrset 147535
nxdomain 183023
recursion 442326
failure 11897
Make sure you are really talking to the correct named. Maybe a you have a
rndc.conf file.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Hello everyone,
I use nsupdate to dynamically update a reverse lookup zone hosted by my
BIND9 setup. For that purpose, I've created host-type HMAC-MD5 keys,
added an appropriate "key" section to my configuration, added the updating
host to the "controls" section, and added an "allow-update" par
One named and same version on both, but has a installation date august
#ps -ef | grep named
root 137 1 0 Dec 11 ? 4297:13 /usr/local/sbin/named -c
/var/named/named.conf
/usr/local/sbin
#/usr/local/sbin/named -v
BIND 9.5.0-P2
/usr/local/sbin
-Original Message-
There may be more than one "named" binary in your path. You may want to do
an explicit reference to check the version (./named -V) or do a "which
named"
Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd
OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577
http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039
aim: matthewbhuf
In my logging global section I have:
logging {
channel audit_log {
file "/var/log/named_audit.log" versions 128 size 4m;
severity debug;
print-time yes;
print-category yes;
};
...
category client { audit_log; };
...
};
and I get:
...
17-Feb-2009 08:14:17.376 queries: client 6
I think you're rigth, when I check the file sizes they are not same but
versions are matching...
short
--
#ls -la
total 48166
drwxr-xr-x 2 root other512 Aug 15 2008 .
drwxr-xr-x 13 root other512 Nov 21 14:02 ..
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root other1199932 Aug
On Feb 17 2009, Cihan Subasi (Garanti Teknoloji) wrote:
When I run "rndc stats" on two different servers with 9.5.0-p2, I am getting
two different dumps of stats, one of them dumps the stats in very short format
(7 lines), the other dumps it in very long format (50-60lines per dump)..What
could
BIND 9.4.3-P1, Solaris 8
I'm trying to get a chroot setup to work following the instructions here
http://www.boran.com/security/sp/bind9_20010430.html
# /usr/sbin/named -g -t /var/named/chroot
17-Feb-2009 12:05:56.789 starting BIND 9.4.3-P1 -g -t /var/named/chroot
17-Feb-2009 12:05:56.790 fo
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 12:17 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> It should be unrelated. I would however still upgrade.
Thanks, Mark.
If I don't see the same assertion failure with
the current release, I guess that's closed.
One advantage of upgrading is getting all thos
Hi,
When I run "rndc stats" on two different servers with 9.5.0-p2, I am getting
two different dumps of stats, one of them dumps the stats in very short format
(7 lines), the other dumps it in very long format (50-60lines per dump)..What
could be the difference on both? thank you
SHORT
+++
25 matches
Mail list logo
