Hi Andrew,
We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata
report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at
https://www.rfc
HI Andrew,
We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata
report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at
https://www.rfc
FYI - I deleted this errata report at the request of the submitter.
Thank you,
RFC Editor/rv
> On Jan 11, 2024, at 5:04 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>
> Sasha,
>
> Andrew will take care of it.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 5:37 AM Alexander Vainshtein
> wrote:
> Pavel,
FYI - We deleted this report. The submitter will create a new report with the
correct RFC number (RFC 9537 rather than 9573).
Best regards,
RFC Editor/rv
> On Jun 26, 2024, at 9:04 AM, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9573,
> "MVPN/EVPN Tun
