HI Andrew, We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial. Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).
You may review the report at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7652 Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further information on how to verify errata reports. Further information on errata can be found at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php. Thank you. RFC Editor/rv > On Sep 22, 2023, at 1:05 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9252, > "BGP Overlay Services Based on Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7652 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com> > > Section: 3.2.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > Transposition Offset indicates the bit position, and Transposition > Length indicates the number of bits that are being taken out of the > SRv6 SID value and encoded in the MPLS Label field. The bits that > have been shifted out MUST be set to 0 in the SID value. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Transposition Offset indicates the bit position and Transposition > Length indicates the number of bits that are being taken out of the > SRv6 SID value and put into high order bits of MPLS label field. The > bits that have been shifted out MUST be set to 0 in the SID value. > > Notes > ----- > This errata reverses an editorial change that was made during the AUTH48 > phase and restores the text that came from the WG and IESG review. Refer > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-15#page-10 > > This change was made during the AUTH48 since the "high order bits" was > already covered under various subsections of Sec 6. However, readers have > reported that there are other places in Sec 6 and Sec 5 where transposition > also occurs and that the original text was still required. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC9252 (draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-15) > -------------------------------------- > Title : BGP Overlay Services Based on Segment Routing over IPv6 > (SRv6) > Publication Date : July 2022 > Author(s) : G. Dawra, Ed., K. Talaulikar, Ed., R. Raszuk, B. > Decraene, S. Zhuang, J. Rabadan > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : BGP Enabled ServiceS > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
