Hi,
New WGLC is now closed and no objection has been raised.
Authors confirmed again unawareness of any undisclosed IPR.
We got again confirmation that implementation exists.
We'll move forward with the draft.
I'll review it again and provide any comments.
Stephane
From:
Hi Matthew,
I support this being a WG document.
IANAL. I don't understand the process by which an author who previously said
"no derivative works" for an I-D is able to relax that constraint in a new
revision. Maybe simply posting a new revision without the constraint is
enough. Maybe the c
Not speaking for the trust, but as someone who has worked in the rights
pace for IETF for quite some time, if the authors update the rights
grant to grant the needed rights (by replacing the boilerplate), then
the new draft grants the needed rights. They have legal ability to make
such a chang
I support WG adoption.
Best regards,
Shunwan
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2023 6:45 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption Poll for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-uasge-16
Thanks, Joel.
That’s really helpful.
Pedantically, suppose there was an author on the old draft who is not an author
on the new draft?
(I think we are into esoteric grounds here, but just wondering.)
A
From: Joel Halpern
Sent: 06 October 2023 14:08
To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Matt
The rules for joint works are somewhat esoteric, but the short answer is
that any of the authors have the right to grant rights on behalf of all
the authors because of the "joint" work nature.
Yours,
Joel
On 10/6/2023 9:19 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
Thanks, Joel.
That’s really helpful.
Peda
Hello Jeffrey,
Thanks again for your reply. Please look below for EV>
-éric
From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
Date: Wednesday, 4 October 2023 at 20:24
To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) , The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-evpn-aggregation-la...@ietf.org
, bess-cha...@ietf.org
, bess@ietf.org , slitkows.i
Nice!
From: Joel Halpern
Sent: 06 October 2023 14:24
To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Matthew Bocci (Nokia)' ;
bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Adoption Poll for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-uasge-16
The rules for joint works are somewhat esoteric,
Hi Linda,
Thank you for your reply. I now understand the solution described in the draft
and I support its WG adoption.
Best Regards,
Shunwan
From: Linda Dunbar [mailto:linda.dun...@futurewei.com]
Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 4:42 AM
To: Zhuangshunwan ; bess@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Mail regardin
I support the WG adoption of this draft.
Thanks.
Diego.
From: BESS on behalf of "Matthew Bocci (Nokia)"
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 7:51 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-02
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-12.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS (BESS) WG of the IETF.
Title: Preference-based EVPN DF Election
Authors: J. Rabadan
S. Sathappan
W. Lin
J. Drake
A. Sajassi
Hi Peter,
Thank you very much for your review.
Please see my comments/resolutions in-line with [Jorge]. All your comments are
addressed in version 12 that we just published.
Thanks.
Jorge
From: Peter Yee via Datatracker
Date: Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:41 AM
To: sec...@ietf.org
Cc: bess@ie
Hi John,
Thanks very much for your review. Great comments as usual.
We addressed them in version 12 of the document. Please let us know if this new
version solves your DISCUSS and COMMENTs.
Also please see in-line with [Jorge].
Thanks!
Jorg
From: John Scudder via Datatracker
Date: Thursday, A
Hi Éric,
Thanks very much for the review. Your comments are addressed in version 12.
Please see in line with [Jorge] for more details.
Thanks.
Jorge
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Date: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 2:35 AM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org
, bess-cha...
Hi Lars,
Thank you very much for your review.
All your comments have been addressed in version 12.
Let us know if you have further questions.
Please see in-line with [Jorge].
Thanks!
Jorge
From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Date: Friday, August 4, 2023 at 4:53 AM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-b
Hi Roman,
Thanks for reviewing.
Your comments, along with John’s and Peter’s should be addressed in version 12
(recently posted).
Let us know if that is not the case, please.
Thanks!
Jorge
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Date: Friday, August 4, 2023 at 12:20 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf
Hi Murray,
Thank you very much for reviewing.
We just published version 12, which we believe addresses your comments.
Thanks!
Jorge
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 11:40 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org
, bess-cha...@ietf.org
Hi Zaheduzzaman,
Thanks for your review.
Section 4.1 bullet D is now completed as follows in version 12:
“A similar procedure can be used for DF Algorithm Lowest-Preference too, that
is, suppose the algorithm for vES2 is Lowest-Preference, and PE1 (the DF) goes
on maintenance mode. The operato
Hi Warren,
Thank you for reviewing.
We published version 12, which hopefully addresses most of the comments and
discuss.
About why two algorithms:
Initially only highest-preference was defined and implemented, however, there
was feedback from the Shepherd and others in the WG that defining th
Thank you, Jorge, for taking the time to reply.
I can only regret the use of “DP” rather than “DNP”, but you have a point if
there are existing implementations.
Regards
-éric
From: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia)
Date: Friday, 6 October 2023 at 21:51
To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) , The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 3:53 PM, Jorge Rabadan
wrote:
> Hi Warren,
>
>
>
> Thank you for reviewing.
>
>
>
> We published version 12, which hopefully addresses most of the comments
> and discuss.
>
>
>
> About why two algorithms:
>
>
>
> Initially only highest-preference was defined and implemente
I support the WG adoption of this draft.
Thanks
Dan
From: BESS on behalf of "Matthew Bocci (Nokia)"
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 10:49 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-a...@ietf.org"
Subject: [EXT][bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
draft-trr-bess-bgp-srv6-args-
I reviewed the draft and it’s important updates to RFC 9252 to support SRV6
BGP service overlay to support SRv6 SID ARG field for endpoint behaviors
that require it namely with EVPN RT-1 and RT-3.
I support WG adoption.
Thanks
Gyan
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:50 AM Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <
matt
Hi,
I support the WG adoption.
Best,
Hang
From: BESS On Behalf Of Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2023 6:45 PM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-us...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG Adoption Poll for draft-ietf-bess-bgp-sdwan-uasge-16
WG
This email starts a one-week
I support the WG adoption of this draft. It's an important update for RFC9252
and benifits the implementation.
Regards,
Yao___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Thank you Warren.
Jorge
From: Warren Kumari
Date: Friday, October 6, 2023 at 1:55 PM
To: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia)
Cc: The IESG , draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org
, bess-cha...@ietf.org
, bess@ietf.org , Stephane Litkowski
Subject: Re: Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df
26 matches
Mail list logo
