Hi Neeraj,
Thanks for clarifying. Please see inline with tag [SD] for couple of them.
Thanks,
Saumya.
From: Neeraj Malhotra (nmalhotr) [mailto:nmalh...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 4:12 AM
To: Dikshit, Saumya ;
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobil...@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf
Ali’s reasoning makes sense to me too.
Thanks.
Jorge
From: BESS on behalf of gregory.mir...@ztetx.com
Date: Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 11:37 PM
To: jdrake=40juniper@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) ,
sajassi=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org ,
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.o
I have following queries regarding this draft:
Do we intend-to-use/call-out-usage-of “wild-card/don’t-care” values for
attributes carried in the sub-TLVs ?
For example, If the admin intends to check the reachability to host
(MAC_X/IP_X) published (in route-type-2) by remote PE.
The r
A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Mankamana Prasad
Mishra, a Secretary of the bess working group.
-
Working Group Name: BGP Enabled ServiceS
Area Name: Routing Area
Session Requester: Mankamana Mishra
Number of S
