Re: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

2017-08-21 Thread Alvaro Retana (aretana)
Ali: Hi! So, you’re really only changing the 0x0C – 0xFA range, right? If my hex is not wrong, you’re missing some pieces below: 0x40-0x7F, and 0xC0-0xCF, which I’m assume remain Unassigned, right? Thanks! Alvaro. On 8/16/17, 5:54 PM, "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" mailto:saja...@cisco.com>> wrote

Re: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

2017-08-21 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Hi Alvaro, You're right. I had some holes in my assignment. Following should fix it. Value Meaning Reference 0x0C-0x7A Unassigned 0x7B-0x7E Experimental this document 0x7F Reserved this document 0x80-0xFA Reserved for Composite tunnel this document 0xFB-0xFE Experimental RFC738

Re: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

2017-08-21 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Trying for the 2nd time because of the format scramble in the previous email. Value MeaningReference 0x0C-0x7A Unassigned 0x7B-0x7E Experimentalthis document 0x7FReserved this documen

Re: [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12

2017-08-21 Thread Alvaro Retana (aretana)
Ali: Hi! RFC7385 already defines an Experimental range, why do we need another one? Same question about reserving 0x7F (if rfc7385 already reserved 0xFF). One of the reasons I’m asking is because if you’re only changing the 0x0C – 0xFA range, which is currently unassigned, the you (1) only ne