Hi Alvaro, You're right. I had some holes in my assignment. Following should fix it.
Value Meaning Reference 0x0C-0x7A Unassigned 0x7B-0x7E Experimental this document 0x7F Reserved this document 0x80-0xFA Reserved for Composite tunnel this document 0xFB-0xFE Experimental RFC7385] 0xFF Reserved [RFC7385] Thanks, Ali From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aret...@cisco.com<mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> Date: Monday, August 21, 2017 at 1:05 PM To: Cisco Employee <saja...@cisco.com<mailto:saja...@cisco.com>>, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpign...@cisco.com<mailto:cpign...@cisco.com>>, "ops-...@ietf.org<mailto:ops-...@ietf.org>" <ops-...@ietf.org<mailto:ops-...@ietf.org>> Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree....@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree....@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree....@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree....@ietf.org>>, "bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>" <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-etree-12 Ali: Hi! So, you're really only changing the 0x0C - 0xFA range, right? If my hex is not wrong, you're missing some pieces below: 0x40-0x7F, and 0xC0-0xCF, which I'm assume remain Unassigned, right? Thanks! Alvaro. On 8/16/17, 5:54 PM, "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <saja...@cisco.com<mailto:saja...@cisco.com>> wrote: To maximize backward/forward compatibility, let's retain the value for "Experimental Use" and "Reserved" as before per [RFC7385] and reduce the range for Composite tunnel for this draft. So, the changes will be >From existing IANA assignments: 0x0C - 0xFA Unassigned 0xFB - 0xFE Experimental [RFC7385] 0xFF Reserved [RFC7385] To: 0x0C - 0x3F Unassigned 0x80 - 0xBF reserved for composite tunnel 0xD0 - 0xFA Unassigned 0xFB - 0xFE Experimental [RFC7385] 0xFF Reserved [RFC7385]
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
