RE: Why do we even HAVE to... (was: Why using use strict;)

because Perl has evolved over time? joel -Original Message- From: Jake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 June 2002 13:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Why do we even HAVE to... (was: Why using use strict;) So, in post after post after post I see the comment "always use s

RE: Why do we even HAVE to... (was: Why using use strict;)

> -Original Message- > From: Jake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:19 AM > To: Nikola Janceski; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Why do we even HAVE to... (was: Why using use strict;) > > > IMHO only the first of these may be a valid re

RE: Why do we even HAVE to... (was: Why using use strict;)

> -Original Message- > From: Jake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Why do we even HAVE to... (was: Why using use strict;) > > > So, in post after post after post I see the comment "alw

Re: Why do we even HAVE to... (was: Why using use strict;)

IMHO only the first of these may be a valid reason. But I dont know much about "perl one liners". Your second reason is particularly bad, beginners are the ones who need "use strict" the most! On Wednesday 05 June 2002 10:12 am, Nikola Janceski wrote: > because it would reek havoc on all the

RE: Why do we even HAVE to... (was: Why using use strict;)

TECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Why do we even HAVE to... (was: Why using use strict;) > > > So, in post after post after post I see the comment "always > use strict"... > > I have seen threads where people a

Why do we even HAVE to... (was: Why using use strict;)

So, in post after post after post I see the comment "always use strict"... I have seen threads where people are insulted because they dont... Every perl tutorial I've seen says you should always "use strict"... It apparently doesnt slow down code execution... If you dont "use strict", the perl

Re: Why using use strict;

On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 05:51 , Bob Showalter wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Janek Schleicher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:19 AM >> Octavian Rasnita wrote at Tue, 04 Jun 2002 08:03:21 +0200: >>> >>> I know why I should use "use strict;" bu

RE: Why using use strict;

> -Original Message- > From: Octavian Rasnita [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Why using use strict; > > > Hi all, > > I know why I should use "use strict;" but what happen i

RE: Why using use strict;

> -Original Message- > From: Janek Schleicher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Why using use strict; > > > Octavian Rasnita wrote at Tue, 04 Jun 2002 08:03:21 +0200: > > > Hi all,

Re: Why using use strict;

Octavian Rasnita wrote at Tue, 04 Jun 2002 08:03:21 +0200: > Hi all, > > I know why I should use "use strict;" but what happen if I use "use strict;" then >if the code is > OK, I delete this line? > use strict has (e.g.) the benefit for checking for undef values. They can come from the inpu

RE: Why using use strict;

- From: Octavian Rasnita [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 June 2002 07:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Why using use strict; Hi all, I know why I should use "use strict;" but what happen if I use "use strict;" then if the code is OK, I delete this line? Shouldn

Why using use strict;

Hi all, I know why I should use "use strict;" but what happen if I use "use strict;" then if the code is OK, I delete this line? Shouldn't it work the same without this line if the code has no problems? Thanks. Teddy, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For ad