On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 05:51 , Bob Showalter wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Janek Schleicher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:19 AM
>> Octavian Rasnita wrote at Tue, 04 Jun 2002 08:03:21 +0200:
>>>
>>> I know why I should use "use strict;" but what happen if
>>
>> use strict has (e.g.) the benefit for checking for undef values.
>
> Nope. That's one of the things "use warnings" (or -w) does.
Hence why the question really should be
what if i drive down the street without the lap and
shoulder belt on - the buzzer will finally go off....
The 'use strict' helps one with the stuff more protected
in 'refs' and 'vars'.....
Perchance not as important once one has
a) opted to harden the code and never ever, ever, ever
go with changing a line in it
b) ported it completely to being a tomcat java servlet
The problem that we are protecting ourselves from is the
moment in the future when we have to take this piece of
code down for some maintanance.
ciao
drieux
---
ps: as for driving with safety equipage - its the time
that you THINK it is ok, that will be the night you
get to sit up in ER having a chat with the radiologist
as you look at the X-rays and say:
"Damn.... I thought that part of the facial bone
structure was designed to prevent cracking that
part of the bone structure over the sinuses..."
Or should I park this story in the context of my LIFE NRA
member cousin who capped a 9mm round through his tigh one
evening from an unloaded handgun he was planning to clean
because, well, he'd cleaned enough of them... and now has
no problem understanding why we all consider all of them
LOADED and LEATHAL - PERIOD - no discussion, no debate.
UNPROTECTED PERL CODE CAN CREEP IN AND EAT YOU!!!!!
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
