Re: xml::twig help

2008-03-20 Thread mirod
ken Foskey wrote: > Updated to fix memory problem, you have to purge. Takes over 30 > minutes for 120K records. > > I am sure that the whole process can be done better with a good > understanding of the module. Will benchmark XML::Rules though. Not knowing the structure of the XML you are pr

Re: xml::twig help

2008-03-18 Thread Rob Dixon
Ken Foskey wrote: > For the record on a more complex script than the address one... xml:simple 7 hours plus on very quick machine, still running and absolutely hammering the system, 1.3 Gig of memory used. xml::twig 1 hour on laptop (underpowered and not much memory), Linux still usable whil

Re: xml::twig help

2008-03-18 Thread ken Foskey
For the record on a more complex script than the address one... xml:simple 7 hours plus on very quick machine, still running and absolutely hammering the system, 1.3 Gig of memory used. xml::twig 1 hour on laptop (underpowered and not much memory), Linux still usable while running. Definitely

Re: xml::twig help

2008-03-18 Thread Rob Dixon
Ken Foskey wrote: On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 00:55 +1100, Ken Foskey wrote: I am extracting addresses from an XML file to process through other programs using pipe delimiter the following code works but this is going to get 130,000 records through it it must be very efficient and I cannot follow the

Re: xml::twig help

2008-03-17 Thread ken Foskey
Updated to fix memory problem, you have to purge. Takes over 30 minutes for 120K records. I am sure that the whole process can be done better with a good understanding of the module. Will benchmark XML::Rules though. On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 00:55 +1100, Ken Foskey wrote: > I am extracting addre

Re: xml::twig help

2008-03-17 Thread Jenda Krynicky
From: Ken Foskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I am extracting addresses from an XML file to process through other > programs using pipe delimiter the following code works but this is going > to get 130,000 records through it it must be very efficient and I cannot > follow the documentation on the best w

Re: xml::twig help

2008-03-17 Thread Jay Savage
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Ken Foskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am extracting addresses from an XML file to process through other > programs using pipe delimiter the following code works but this is going > to get 130,000 records through it it must be very efficient and I cannot >

Re: xml::twig help

2008-03-17 Thread Rob Dixon
Ken Foskey wrote: I am extracting addresses from an XML file to process through other programs using pipe delimiter the following code works but this is going to get 130,000 records through it it must be very efficient and I cannot follow the documentation on the best way to do this. After this

xml::twig help

2008-03-17 Thread Ken Foskey
I am extracting addresses from an XML file to process through other programs using pipe delimiter the following code works but this is going to get 130,000 records through it it must be very efficient and I cannot follow the documentation on the best way to do this. After this simple one is progr