Ken Foskey wrote:
>
For the record on a more complex script than the address one...

xml:simple   7 hours plus on very quick machine, still running and
absolutely hammering the system, 1.3 Gig of memory used.

xml::twig  1 hour on laptop (underpowered and not much memory), Linux
still usable while running.

Definitely worth the time learning XML::Twig.

I have never found XML::Simple to be either simple or efficient. It's a
shame that it earns its reputation by seeming to be approachable.

My vote would be with XML::LibXML, but XML::Twig is pretty good.

Rob

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://learn.perl.org/


Reply via email to