Re: Replying to the perl list (was Re: problem with whitespace not splitting on split.)

> In practice, I use two types of replies. One to all the list > recipients and one to only the author of this particular message. > It's silly to send the message to the entire list and send a > duplicate to the author. (He already has a copy because he is a > member of the list.) > I do agr

Re: Replying to the perl list (was Re: problem with whitespace not splitting on split.)

On Sat, 2006-29-04 at 07:47 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > "Rance" == Rance Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Rance> All of my other lists behave in the reverse, if you reply, it goes to > Rance> the list, if you reply all, a second copy goes to the individual. > > Oh geez. Here we

RE: Replying to the perl list (was Re: problem with whitespace not splitting on split.)

Randal L. Schwartz wrote: : Oh geez. Here we go again. : : Please read . : And understand that *no* list managed at lists.perl.org will : *ever* have reply-to set. Thank goodness. :) : : Your other lists coddle to the beginners who can't operate t

Re: Replying to the perl list (was Re: problem with whitespace not splitting on split.)

> "Rance" == Rance Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rance> All of my other lists behave in the reverse, if you reply, it goes to Rance> the list, if you reply all, a second copy goes to the individual. Oh geez. Here we go again. Please read .

Replying to the perl list (was Re: problem with whitespace not splitting on split.)

Chad Perrin wrote: On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:42:51AM -0500, Rance Hall wrote: some mail readers are probably capable of reading the list header and figuring it out, but I bet others don't (like mine) I use Mutt, which allows me to list-reply, but without setting up custom configurations it