On Sat, 2006-29-04 at 07:47 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > >>>>> "Rance" == Rance Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Rance> All of my other lists behave in the reverse, if you reply, it goes to > Rance> the list, if you reply all, a second copy goes to the individual. > > Oh geez. Here we go again. > > Please read <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>. > And understand that *no* list managed at lists.perl.org will *ever* > have reply-to set. Thank goodness. :) > > Your other lists coddle to the beginners who can't operate their mail client, > at the expense of experts who *can*. Let's not hobble the experts, or the > experts will go away.
If you want us to use "Reply to All" then stop sending those iterating automatic replies that says you are too busy to answer your mail and will get to it later. In fact, stop sending all automatic replies. I don't care if you're on vacation and won't respond for three weeks; if it was important I would have phoned. If it's e-mail, it's not that important. Please, no more automatic replies. -- __END__ Just my 0.00000002 million dollars worth, --- Shawn "For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them." Aristotle * Perl tutorials at http://perlmonks.org/?node=Tutorials * A searchable perldoc is at http://perldoc.perl.org/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
