B McKee wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm slowly creating my Perl Masterpiece (tm)
> I'll let ya all giggle over it when I'm done :-)
> At any rate - It's done what I believe you call "top-down".
> I declare the subs,
Not generally necessary, and oftentimes problematic, in Perl
> then have the co
> From: "Wiggins d Anconia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I like most of this answer. I would add that you should drop the
> > declarations of the subs, they are unneeded in Perl and can break some
> > "features". This will help to some extent depending on your calling
> > order.
>
> ???
>
> 1. The
On Feb 26, 2004, at 11:47 AM, B McKee wrote:
Hi All,
I'm slowly creating my Perl Masterpiece (tm)
I'll let ya all giggle over it when I'm done :-)
At any rate - It's done what I believe you call "top-down".
I declare the subs, then have the code for the main program,
then the subroutine code blo
> On Feb 26, 2004, at 11:47 AM, B McKee wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm slowly creating my Perl Masterpiece (tm)
> > I'll let ya all giggle over it when I'm done :-)
> > At any rate - It's done what I believe you call "top-down".
> > I declare the subs, then have the code for the main program
Hi Brian
Brian McKee wrote:
>
> I'm slowly creating my Perl Masterpiece (tm)
> I'll let ya all giggle over it when I'm done :-)
You shouldn't get any laughter from here. All of us have written
a less-than-acceptable Perl script.
> At any rate - It's done what I believe you call "top-down".
>Fro
From: "Wiggins d Anconia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I like most of this answer. I would add that you should drop the
> declarations of the subs, they are unneeded in Perl and can break some
> "features". This will help to some extent depending on your calling
> order.
???
1. The declarations are a
