B McKee wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm slowly creating my Perl Masterpiece (tm) > I'll let ya all giggle over it when I'm done :-) > At any rate - It's done what I believe you call "top-down". > I declare the subs,
Not generally necessary, and oftentimes problematic, in Perl > then have the code for the main program, > then the subroutine code blocks. > My question is what order should the subroutines appear in? > Alphabetical? Order of appearance? Rough grouping by function? > The fact that some subroutines may or may not call other subroutines > and some of the subs are called by pretty much all the other subs > makes it hard for me to decide what order would make it easiest to read. > What's the 'standard'? > > Brian I generally define functions in order of the calls to them, and immediately after the function that calls them. Functions that are called from many places are a bit trickier. I tend to define those after the last call to them. Joseph -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
