Re: Question for those familiar with imagemagick for perl

2002-01-03 Thread Patricko
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:59 PM Subject: Re: Question for those familiar with imagemagick for perl > Thank you for the reply. However, I get a broken image > I cannot avoid problems with

Re: Question for those familiar with imagemagick for perl

2002-01-03 Thread zentara
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:59:48 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Thank you for the reply. However, I get a broken image >I cannot avoid problems with text, it's really weird. Maybe the problem is I >need a full path to the font? I even tried '@font.ttf'. Should I install >ghostscript and only rely on

Re: Question for those familiar with imagemagick for perl

2002-01-02 Thread Joelmon2001
Thank you for the reply. However, I get a broken image I cannot avoid problems with text, it's really weird. Maybe the problem is I need a full path to the font? I even tried '@font.ttf'. Should I install ghostscript and only rely on those type of fonts? Do font paths need to be full? it's stra

Re: Question for those familiar with imagemagick for perl

2002-01-02 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Zentara" == Zentara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Zentara> I found it in the demos for the Perl-magick module. I have this theory that nobody ever codes PerlMagick from the docs, which put plainly, suck. Everyone always starts with some example in the demos, and then mutates it slowly, va

Re: Question for those familiar with imagemagick for perl

2002-01-02 Thread zentara
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 23:03:42 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The problem? After I created a working script where it creates 'button.png' >and views it, I try to add text to it, and no changes take affect. Without >that one line that adds text (Or should) the script is perfect. I don't want >it ch

Re: Question for those familiar with imagemagick for perl

2002-01-01 Thread Joelmon2001
Hey, first of all happy new years and thanks to all that took their time to reply. Now, I no longer get software errors. Basically, I just am dying to add text to my created png files. My stats: Linux Apache webserver Perl 5.00503 I use perlmagick only for web pages, no interest in command line

Re: Question for those familiar with imagemagick for perl

2001-12-28 Thread Joelmon2001
Ok, the first error was the exact error. That's all it stated I am on linux Raq 3 Perl 5.05 The original error was a software error that I posted before now the internal error I get after the recommendation from you and another helpful poster. That internal error is this: Internal Server Erro

RE: Question for those familiar with imagemagick for perl

2001-12-28 Thread Hanson, Robert
27;t printing a Content-type header? Rob -Original Message----- From: Paul Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question for those familiar with imagemagick for perl On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 01:5

Re: Question for those familiar with imagemagick for perl

2001-12-28 Thread Joelmon2001
In a message dated 12/28/01 2:10:56 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > my $q=Image::Magick->new; Hello and thanks for your time. Now I get an internal server error (The default internal error) What's weird is I have another script that uses image magick, t hough the image

Re: Question for those familiar with imagemagick for perl

2001-12-28 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 01:59:38PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, I asked this question to their list, but nobody had an answer, and the > help isn't reliable, so I hope I can ask. It is about a perl script, which > comes with it. button.pl > > It gives a software error: > Software er