Re: CLOSED Re: Obtaining complete Unix command line that evoked script as string

2006-01-19 Thread Jeff Pang
rHost.Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Jan 20, 2006 9:31 AM >To: Grant Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, beginners@perl.org >Subject: Re: CLOSED Re: Obtaining complete Unix command line that evoked >script as string > > > >Grant Jacobs wrote: >> >> Forced

Re: CLOSED Re: Obtaining complete Unix command line that evoked script as string

2006-01-19 Thread JupiterHost.Net
Grant Jacobs wrote: Forced to make time to get off this list as the volume is too much for the megre limit my ISP sets. Thanks again for those that helped; my working solution seems OK for now. Below is a reply to anonymous ("JupiterHost.Net"), anyone else is welcome to ignore it. Wri

Re: CLOSED? Re: Obtaining complete Unix command line that evoked script as string

2006-01-15 Thread JupiterHost.Net
Like a lot of things, there isn't one "right" way to it, the final choice depends on the project, the budget, time constraints, etc. I'm Writing a new shell is quick and cheap? working with shell and perl; it may not be ideal, but is a given. Personally, its silly to tell me I'm an idiot wi

Re: CLOSED? Re: Obtaining complete Unix command line that evoked script as string

2006-01-14 Thread JupiterHost.Net
Hello, Originally my previous post had an explanation of why I really did want the pipes and redirects. I dropped it as I didn't want to be long-winded. Short version: large intermediate data files can be avoided by using pipes. Likewise, I frequently use multiple steps of filtering Ok, s