From: Rob Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thomas Polnik wrote:
> >
> >> Almost anything is better than XML::Simple, but no module can
> >> easily make your data any smaller.
> >
> > I use XML::Simple without any problems since some years. Which
> > problems could I get with with this package? My progra
Thomas Polnik wrote:
Almost anything is better than XML::Simple, but no module can
easily make your data any smaller.
I use XML::Simple without any problems since some years. Which
problems could I get with with this package? My programm converts
many small xml-files (<100kb) to a perl struct
Hello Rob,
> Almost anything is better
> than XML::Simple, but no module can easily make your data any smaller.
I use XML::Simple without any problems since some years. Which problems
could I get with with this package?
My programm converts many small xml-files (<100kb) to a perl structure
daily.
