On Tuesday, July 23, 2002, at 09:45 , chris wrote:
> You are correct.
perchance, but I will accept that as
"oh, well that's worth ripping off and reusing"
as being more accurate...
> I will follow your advice.
may I recommend that you limit following my
advice to only the 'useful p
You are correct. I will follow your advice. Maybe I am making things
more difficult for myself.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 07:26:28 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Drieux) wrote:
>why pass in an uninitialized value??? that is
>scoped to pass out of existence
>
>also this blessed "object" gambit should
On Monday, July 22, 2002, at 04:36 , chris wrote:
> Here is what I am doing
>
> use A;
> my $this = {};
> bless $this;
> my $result = $this->A::sub1 (my $args);
why pass in an uninitialized value??? that is
scoped to pass out of existence
also this blessed "object" gambit should
be in the
Here is what I am doing
use A;
my $this = {};
bless $this;
my $result = $this->A::sub1 (my $args);
Package A;
sub1 {
my $this = shift
my ($data) = @_;
my $result = $this->sub2($data); $this->sub2($data) does not load
return "$result";
}
sub2 {
...
}
I think I can understand why sub2 canno
