You are correct. I will follow your advice. Maybe I am making things more difficult for myself.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 07:26:28 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Drieux) wrote: >why pass in an uninitialized value??? that is >scoped to pass out of existence???? > >also this blessed "object" gambit should >be in the package - not in the calling script, >see details below... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
