On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:41:22 +0100
Alex Becker wrote:
> So my idea was to specify EUMM v6.46 as minimum in PREREQ_PM. This
> way, I would not have to do all this 'if the EUMM version is greater
> than X then add Y to Makefile.PL' stuff.
>
> So, would it work? Does it make sense?
I don't think so;
Hi!
When writing a Makefile.PL for a module (no, I don't want to read about
other ways to do it now), does it make sense to add ExtUtils::MakeMaker
(EUMM) to the PREREQ_PM module prerequisites list?
I'm asking because I saw some Makefile.PL where the installed version of
EUMM was c
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:37:55 +0200
drupsspen wrote:
> I'm building an application in Perl and is looking into using a build
> system for it. So far I've looked at ExtUtils::MakeMaker. I have
> divided my application like this:
>
> bin/foo
> lib/Foo/Bar.pm
> lib/Fo
Hello.
I'm building an application in Perl and is looking into using a build
system for it. So far I've looked at ExtUtils::MakeMaker. I have
divided my application like this:
bin/foo
lib/Foo/Bar.pm
lib/Foo/Baz.pm
The user runs the program by invoking foo, which is an executable
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:18:58 -0700
From: "D.Edmons"
To: Shlomi Fish
Subject: Re: perl Gtk2 install and makemaker install
I tend to hand-crank mine. My preferred distro was SourceMage for that
reason (I was a developer there for a short time), but t
Hi El'ad/Dale,
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:29:24 -0700
"D.Edmons" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get Gtk2 installed. I'm upgrading my local directory to
> the current stable perl and now need Gtk2 so that I may learn perlgtk2.
>
> I get the following error when I run `perl Makefile.PL':
> ---
mpilation aborted at (eval 4) line 1.
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
MakeMaker FATAL: prerequisites not found.
ExtUtils::Depends not installed
ExtUtils::PkgConfig not installed
Glib not installed
Pango not installed
Please install these modules first and rer
Hi Raheel,
On Friday 30 Apr 2010 14:17:03 Raheel Hassan wrote:
> Hi Shlomi,
>
> I am very thankful to you for helping me, yes i resolved the problem
> actually perl-devel was missing. So when i executed 'urpmi perl-devel' i
> got EXTERN.h. Now i am able to install all the required packages from
>
> >need the Mandriva version - please do:
> >[shell]
> >shlomi:~$ cat /etc/mandriva-release
> >Mandriva Linux release 2010.1 (Cooker) for i586
> >shlomi:~$
> >[/shell]
>
> Here is the version number
> [r...@localhost ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.56]# cat /etc/man
t;>shlomi:~$ cat /etc/mandriva-release
>>Mandriva Linux release 2010.1 (Cooker) for i586
>>shlomi:~$
>>[/shell]
>
> Here is the version number
> [r...@localhost ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.56]# cat /etc/mandriva-release
> Mandriva Linux release 2009.0 (Official) for i586
>
er) for i586
>shlomi:~$
>[/shell]
Here is the version number
[r...@localhost ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.56]# cat /etc/mandriva-release
Mandriva Linux release 2009.0 (Official) for i586
>You can install most of them using urpmi. Not that there are several
modules
>that start with ExtUtils. Se
Hi Raheel,
On Thursday 22 Apr 2010 17:19:58 Raheel Hassan wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, I am using 2.6.27.24-2xossmp version of Mandriva.
2.6.27.24-2 is the kernel version (which is kinda old - I'm using 2.6.33.2). I
need the Mandriva version - please do:
[shell]
shlomi:~$ cat /etc/mandriva-
55 PM
> > Subject: ExtUtils-Makemaker comilation problems.
> > To: beginners@perl.org
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > When i am trying to install ExtUtils i have these errors are coming. I am
> > trying ti install it in Mandriva. Can any one can give be t
*I have only these files.
[r...@localhost /]# find -name 'CORE'*
./usr/lib/perl5/5.10.1/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE
./usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE
[r...@localhost /]# cd /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.1/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE
[r...@localhost CORE]# ls
config.h git_version.h lib
Hi Raheel!
On Thursday 22 Apr 2010 14:21:20 Raheel Hassan wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Raheel Hassan
> Date: Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:55 PM
> Subject: ExtUtils-Makemaker comilation problems.
> To: beginners@perl.org
>
>
> Hi,
>
> When i
>
> When i am trying to install ExtUtils i have these errors are coming. I
> am
> trying ti install it in Mandriva. Can any one can give be the clue.
> Thanks
> in advance.
>
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.1/**ExtUtils/typemap Test.xs > Test.xsc && mv
> Test.xsc
> Test.c
> # make[1]: *** No rule to mak
-- Forwarded message --
From: Raheel Hassan
Date: Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:55 PM
Subject: ExtUtils-Makemaker comilation problems.
To: beginners@perl.org
Hi,
When i am trying to install ExtUtils i have these errors are coming. I am
trying ti install it in Mandriva. Can any one can
Hi,
When i am trying to install ExtUtils i have these errors are coming. I am
trying ti install it in Mandriva. Can any one can give be the clue. Thanks
in advance.
*[r...@localhost ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.56]# perl Makefile.PL*
Writing Makefile for ExtUtils::MakeMaker
*[r...@localhost ExtUtils
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 06:50:39PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Hi all,
> However, when I run "make test", the Perl code for print does not execute.
>
> I seem to be searching for the wrong problem in the usual places, so I'd
> like to ask for advice on the best way to allow print statements to
On 2010.04.16 11:32, Philip Potter wrote:
> On 16 April 2010 14:38, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> This particular test:
> It sounds like your test isn't a test, it's a setup tool. Tests in
> projdir/t are there to test if the stuff in projdir/lib or
> projdir/blib works, and shouldn't be dependent on
On 16 April 2010 14:38, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> On 2010.04.16 09:15, Philip Potter wrote:
>> What are you *actually*
>> trying to do? What are you testing and why does this test require you
>> to print output to the user under "make test"?
>
> This particular test:
>
> - checks to see if an existi
On 2010.04.16 09:15, Philip Potter wrote:
> On 16 April 2010 13:20, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> I use prove often, usually when I want to quickly and non-verbosely (-Q)
>> work with a single test file that I'm currently adding new tests to, or
>> to ensure existing tests still pass if making changes
On 16 April 2010 13:20, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> I use prove often, usually when I want to quickly and non-verbosely (-Q)
> work with a single test file that I'm currently adding new tests to, or
> to ensure existing tests still pass if making changes to a function.
>
> What I want to be able to do
On 2010.04.16 03:36, Philip Potter wrote:
> On 16 April 2010 02:05, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> On 2010.04.15 18:50, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> What I've done to 'rectify' the issue so that it is clear that the
>> config files differ, is rename the test to the highest test number
>> (999-upgrade.t) so
On 16 April 2010 02:05, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> On 2010.04.15 18:50, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In one of my projects, I've written a test file t/22-upgrade.t.
>
> [..snip..]
>
>> However, when I run "make test", the Perl code for print does not execute.
>
> Replying my own post, this
On 2010.04.15 18:50, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In one of my projects, I've written a test file t/22-upgrade.t.
[..snip..]
> However, when I run "make test", the Perl code for print does not execute.
Replying my own post, this project is currently only used by us internally.
What I've
Hi all,
In one of my projects, I've written a test file t/22-upgrade.t.
I have a test within this file that looks for an existing installation,
checks the versions, and compares the configuration files
An upgrade does not overwrite the existing config, instead printing out
a warning with a list
Thank.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 19:28, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
Insi de my Makefile.PL, I would like to do something like:
LIBS => ['-lm -L$(PATH) -lmlib'],
with $PATH define at the beginning of the file, but I cannot make it
work
What am I doing wrong ?
snip
I see two things wron
Chas. Owens wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 19:28, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
Insi de my Makefile.PL, I would like to do something like:
LIBS => ['-lm -L$(PATH) -lmlib'],
with $PATH define at the beginning of the file, but I cannot make it
work
What am I doing wrong ?
snip
I see two t
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 19:28, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Insi de my Makefile.PL, I would like to do something like:
> LIBS => ['-lm -L$(PATH) -lmlib'],
>
> with $PATH define at the beginning of the file, but I cannot make it
> work
> What am I doing wrong ?
snip
I see two things wro
Hello,
Insi de my Makefile.PL, I would like to do something like:
LIBS => ['-lm -L$(PATH) -lmlib'],
with $PATH define at the beginning of the file, but I cannot make it
work
What am I doing wrong ?
Thank.
--
---
==
Hi all.
I'm writing an app in Gtk2-Perl. I want to include things like glade XML
files, and images. How do I go about that? I would like to be able to do
something like create an app folder:
/usr/share/some_application
and dump stuff in there. Can I do that? How?
Dan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail
a. utilize the 'LIB= argument when creating your makefile
> example: perl Makefile.PL LIB=/users/george/myperlprogram/lib/
This is due to bugs in MakeMaker prior to 6.XX (ie. what comes with perl
prior to 5.8.0). The proper thing to use is PREFIX, not LIB. PREFIX
covers *
Thank you.
George Szynal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:For those who want/need to install a
Perl app or extension without perturbing the default perl library tree.
Possible reasons:
1. Disambiguating the existing libs from your libs (for testing perhaps)
2. Not wanting to or not having rights to log
For those who want/need to install a Perl app or extension without perturbing the
default perl library tree.
Possible reasons:
1. Disambiguating the existing libs from your libs (for testing perhaps)
2. Not wanting to or not having rights to login as a supervisor (or as a user with
admin ri
i am writing a module that is a helper module and is part of a larger project
... i am using h2xs and MakeMaker to make the module 'cos i need to distribute
this out to other people who are using the 'larger project' ... i am running
into problems in that the larger project has a
36 matches
Mail list logo