Re: IDE's

2002-08-22 Thread Osmundo Fernandez
enner" 1.com> cc: Su

Re: Re: IDE's

2002-08-22 Thread Jochen Berger
It's me again... If payware / shareware is ok for you, then try JPad Pro or SidePad Pro by Modelworks (www.modelworks.com). You can use it for a variety of languages, e.g. Java, C, C++, C#, Perl etc. Have a look. CU Jochen Berger Tim Musson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 22.08.02 13:39:37:

Re: IDE's

2002-08-22 Thread shawn_milochik
Subject: IDE&#

Re: IDE's

2002-08-22 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Matt, My MUA believes you used Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) to write the following on Thursday, August 22, 2002 at 4:10:40 AM. >> I'm using Komodo from Active State and find it very slow when >> running code. Can anyone recommend a Windows based app that >> pro

Re: IDE's

2002-08-22 Thread Jochen Berger
Hi! Look for "Open Perl IDE" at SourceForge (http://sourceforge.net/projects/open-perl-ide/). The entire IDE (including manual) is about 1.6 MB. You can edit, debug and run scripts. I like it. CU Jochen Berger "Stan Benner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 22.08.02 07:55:33: > I'm using Komodo

RE: IDE's

2002-08-22 Thread Matt Wetherill
295 5853 ** > -Original Message- > From: Stan Benner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 22 August 2002 18:55 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: IDE's > > > I'm using Komodo from Active State and find it very slow when > r

IDE's

2002-08-21 Thread Stan Benner
I'm using Komodo from Active State and find it very slow when running code. Can anyone recommend a Windows based app that provides an IDE that I can run perl code in? I'm totally new to perl and would prefer not using notepad to write perl code and then using the dos window for output. Any help?

Re: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor

2002-08-21 Thread Ramprasad A Padmanabhan
age- >>From: Paul Tremblay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:24 PM >>To: begin begin >>Subject: Re: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor >> >> >>I'm surprised that more posters didn't advocate vim as *the*

RE: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor

2002-07-31 Thread Nikola Janceski
see inline comments > -Original Message- > From: Paul Tremblay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:24 PM > To: begin begin > Subject: Re: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor > > > I'm surprised that more posters didn&#

Re: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor

2002-07-31 Thread Paul Tremblay
I'm surprised that more posters didn't advocate vim as *the* editor. I think it is linux world that did a survey and found that 80 percent of the users picked vim as their favorite editor. I originally started using vim, then switched to nedit, and now have switched back to vim. Nedit if very ni

Re: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor

2002-07-31 Thread drieux
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 08:04 , Nikola Janceski wrote: > Yep even the best of syntax highlighting patterns still can't handle some > of > those FUNKY regexs I use in my perl program. don't EVEN get me started... { "too late drieux" } hum. parenting code, is like parentin

RE: Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor

2002-07-31 Thread Nikola Janceski
Yep even the best of syntax highlighting patterns still can't handle some of those FUNKY regexs I use in my perl program. > -Original Message- > From: drieux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:46 AM > To: begin begin > Subject: Perl IDE&#

Perl IDE's v. Perl Editors was Re: Editor

2002-07-31 Thread drieux
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 06:43 , Scott Barnett wrote: [..] > What is a good Perl Editor for writing scripts? The Correct Answer is: The one on the machine where you do your editing. That simplifies the process for you. I am partial to doing my development with bbedit 6.