From: edw...@yandex.ru
>
> The problem is that I did this benchmarking before. Actually, the code
> snippets above are run in
> a very long cycle, and if we have "foreach" statement, then we need to store
> some value for loop iteration and
> even one assignment of this variable consumes time
; > .
> >
> > block[$_ = 100]
> >
> > Where block[$_ = n] means "block" with all occurences of $_ substituted with
> > n.
> > Of course, we presume that array like (1..100) is known at compile time.
> Can you explain why you want to do this?
&g
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:16, Jim Gibson wrote:
> On 4/16/09 Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:39 PM, "edw...@yandex.ru"
> scribbled:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to know, how to force perl unfold "foreach" expression during
>> the
>> compilation, i.e. I want next code:
snip
> Can you explain why you want
t; }
>
> to be compiled like this:
>
> block[$_ = 1]
>
> block[$_ = 2]
>
> block[$_ = 3]
>
> .
> .
> .
>
> block[$_ = 100]
>
> Where block[$_ = n] means "block" with all occurences of $_ substituted with
> n.
> Of course, we presume
Hello,
I would like to know, how to force perl unfold "foreach" expression during the
compilation, i.e. I want next code:
foreach (1..100) {
block
}
to be compiled like this:
block[$_ = 1]
block[$_ = 2]
block[$_ = 3]
.
.
.
block[$_ = 100]
Where block[$_ = n] means "block" with
Hello Ray,
Thanks for your response. I could already solve the problem. It was caused by
a syntax error in a different line within the same sub.:-) I read my source
code over and over and finally find the error.
Best Regards,
Oliver Block
Am Donnerstag, 11. September 2008 16:30:49 schrieb Ra
Oliver Block wrote:
hello everybody,
Hello,
what may cause perl to give the following command line output
Global symbol "$form" requires explicit package name at /.../Address.pm line
44.
even if the variable $form is declared in line 16 as follows
my $form = $self->formbuilder;
Hi Oliver,
You have to show more of the source code -- but it sounds like you've
declared $form with "my" within a function/subroutine and it is not
visible outside the function? Could that be the problem?
Ray
Oliver Block wrote:
hello everybody,
what may cause perl to give the followin
hello everybody,
what may cause perl to give the following command line output
Global symbol "$form" requires explicit package name at /.../Address.pm line
44.
even if the variable $form is declared in line 16 as follows
my $form = $self->formbuilder;
within a sub of a class definit
On 21 Aug., 20:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rich Murphy) wrote:
> Could anyone point me to a good site for pearl compiler download.
On windows I use the ActiveState distribution. They have a free PERL
interpreter too.
http://www.activestate.com/Products/activeperl/index.mhtml
--
To unsubscribe
rich murphy wrote:
>
> Could anyone point me to a good site for pearl compiler download.
The short answer is here
http://www.perl.org/
But it depends on what platform you are working on, and whether you know what
the perl compiler is.
Tell us more about what you want to do if this d
Could anyone point me to a good site for pearl compiler download.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://learn.perl.org/
Perl Mavens,
I need a C compiler that I can run under Windows 98. Already d/l
Cygwin and gcc-4.0.1 but not sure how to get things working correctly.
I am working with a mentor locally to get my skills improved; can
someone else point me in the correct direction to complete this
necessary piece
Jonathan Paton wrote:
I think it's *HIGHLY* ironic that the original poster is looking for a
solution that allows him to close off his code, but demands that it be
a freely distributable solution to his problem. My first reaction is:
If you want to lock the door on your code (and I think that is
the application
than try to reverse engineer someone's obfuscated version. (I had
exactly that happen for a work-related project. After spending three
days deobfuscating, I threw up my hands and rewrote from scratch in
one afternoon.)
I was looking into a binary-output Perl compiler some ti
Lawrence Statton wrote:
So the conclusion is that perl code cannot be really hidden (for comercial
purposes)?
A license is equal to zero in some countries... so that's not a solution.
Well - never say, "Never" ... I think the output from perlcc is pretty
inscrutable for any but the most dedicated a
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 15:26:58 -0500 (EST), Chris Devers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
> > So the conclusion is that perl code cannot be really hidden (for
> > comercial purposes)?
>
> For any purposes, yes, code cannot be hidden.
It can be hidden, but i
> So the conclusion is that perl code cannot be really hidden (for comercial
> purposes)?
> A license is equal to zero in some countries... so that's not a solution.
>
Well - never say, "Never" ... I think the output from perlcc is pretty
inscrutable for any but the most dedicated attacker, and a
te? It works.
>
> The problem is I can only get a evaluate license for PDK-Pro-6.0, so
> what I am looking for is a compiler more powerfull than perlcc, and
> must be free.
Again, the question stands: why do you want to do this?
Nearly every instance of Linux in the world is goi
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> So the conclusion is that perl code cannot be really hidden (for
> comercial purposes)?
For any purposes, yes, code cannot be hidden.
More broadly, for any interpreted language -- Perl, Python, Tcl, even
ones like Java and Visual Basic -- it's fair
AIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: I am looking for a free perl compiler.
>
*** Somewhat off-topic ***
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
>
*** Somewhat off-topic ***
> * Obfuscators don't work well enough to bother with. If you can't have
> people reading your code, don't use Perl, or better still, use Perl but
> don't allow access to the machine where the program runs (e.g. put up a
> web interface to a service under your contro
I am looking for a free perl compiler.
My /usr/bin/perl was free :)
I suspect he wants something for Windows.
By "compiler", I further suspect that he wants something that will
generate .exe files that can be run without a perl.exe on the system.
If the usual line of thinkin
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 12:56:15 +0800, Xun Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem is I can only get a evaluate license for PDK-Pro-6.0,
so what I am looking for is a compiler more powerfull than perlcc,
and must be free.
I don't know if this is really what you want,
but you can try
I am going to compile a perl script to binary on linux,
I tried perlcc,
I doesn't always works well.
I tried the same script with perlapp from PDK-Pro-6.0 from ActiveState?
It works.
The problem is I can only get a evaluate license for PDK-Pro-6.0,
so what I am looking for is a compiler
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, JupiterHost.Net wrote:
> Xun Yu wrote:
>
> > I am looking for a free perl compiler.
>
> My /usr/bin/perl was free :)
I suspect he wants something for Windows.
By "compiler", I further suspect that he wants something that will
generate .exe fil
Xun Yu wrote:
Hi, guys,
hello,
I am looking for a free perl compiler.
My /usr/bin/perl was free :)
I tried PDK-Pro-6.0 from ActiveState.
It works pretty well.
But it's not free.
Where can I get a free perl compiler, as powerful as PDK-Pro-6.0 from
ActiveState?
My /usr/bin/perl is pretty pow
Hi, guys,
I am looking for a free perl compiler.
I tried PDK-Pro-6.0 from ActiveState.
It works pretty well.
But it's not free.
Where can I get a free perl compiler, as powerful as PDK-Pro-6.0 from
ActiveState?
Thanks in advance.
Best wishes,
Xun
--
Best wishes,
Xun
--
To unsubscri
It has a lot to do with perl if your modules can't install without it.
-Original Message-
From: Wiggins d Anconia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 10:55 AM
To: Witzke, Rob; PerlBeginners (E-mail)
Subject: Re: C Compiler
> Any recommendations on a c com
> -Original Message-
> From: Witzke, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 4:24 PM
> To: PerlBeginners (E-mail)
> Subject: C Compiler
>
>
> Any recommendations on a c compiler to run on a Sun Sparc box?
>
> Rob
gcc, it is available as a solaris package at sunfreeware.com
-Original Message-
From: Witzke, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:24 AM
To: PerlBeginners (E-mail)
Subject: C Compiler
Any recommendations on a c compiler to run on a Sun Sparc box?
Rob
--
To
>
>Any recommendations on a c compiler to run on a Sun Sparc box?
>
>Rob
this is bordering on off-topic, but since a compiler is useful
for certain Perl modules,
go get gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html
this is a page to get gcc when you can't compile it
> Any recommendations on a c compiler to run on a Sun Sparc box?
>
> Rob
>
This has what to do with Perl?
http://gcc.gnu.org/
http://danconia.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <
Any recommendations on a c compiler to run on a Sun Sparc box?
Rob
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
How do you move what is necessary from one machine to another machine of like
architecture and operating system when NO c compiler allowed? We see the make install
modules and the packaging list. Is there a module which will do this? If not would
using the list from the make be the way
al Message-
From: Alan Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 3:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Getting the free Microsoft compiler to compile PAR
Even though Autrijus kindly supplies pre-compiled PAR packages, I always roll my own
and I have been using VC++ 6.0. I&#x
Pagoda wrote:
> I tried 5.8.3, 5.8.2, 5.8.0, 5.6.1
i tried 5.8.0 in a linux box and there is no error. are you using a
different os?
>
>> Pagoda wrote:
>>
>> > problem about compiler
>> >
>> > Below is the code:
>> > #! /usr/bin/p
Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: "zatoichi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: problem about compiler
> Pagoda wrote:
>
> > problem about compiler
> >
> > Below is the code:
&g
Thanks a lot.
I'll try them.
- Original Message -
From: "Jenda Krynicky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: problem about compiler
> From: "pagoda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> &g
I tried 5.8.3, 5.8.2, 5.8.0, 5.6.1
- Original Message -
From: "david" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:39 AM
Subject: Re: problem about compiler
> Pagoda wrote:
>
> > problem about compiler
> >
>
Pagoda wrote:
> problem about compiler
>
> Below is the code:
> #! /usr/bin/perl
> use Cwd qw/cwd abs_path/;
> print cwd, "\n";
>
> I compiled my code:
> $perlcc -o hello hello.pl
>
i compiled the above without any problem
> the following inf
From: "pagoda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> problem about compiler
>
> Below is the code:
> #! /usr/bin/perl
> use Cwd qw/cwd abs_path/;
> print cwd, "\n";
>
> I compiled my code:
> $perlcc -o hello hello.pl
>
> the following infor were prin
Pagoda wrote:
> problem about compiler
>
> Below is the code:
> #! /usr/bin/perl
> use Cwd qw/cwd abs_path/;
> print cwd, "\n";
>
> I compiled my code:
> $perlcc -o hello hello.pl
>
> the following infor were printed to stdout:
> Note (pr
problem about compiler
Below is the code:
#! /usr/bin/perl
use Cwd qw/cwd abs_path/;
print cwd, "\n";
I compiled my code:
$perlcc -o hello hello.pl
the following infor were printed to stdout:
Note (probably harmless): No library found for -lposix
pccslkmZ.c: In function `perl
Makefile?
You need to use the same compiler that was used to build perl. MakeMaker
(the script that creates the Makefiles) gets that information from the Config
module -->
% perl -MConfig -le 'print "@Config{ qw/cc ccflags/ }"'
cc -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DDEBUGGING
I get
all kinds of errors on the compiler flags...
Thanks for any help!
richf
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please disregard.
tks
-jh
-Original Message-
From: Hodge, Jeff F (ECIII) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 2:33 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: c compiler needs
while config-ing perl 5.8.0 with
sh Configure -Accflags="-DPERL_Y2KWARN -DPERL
while config-ing perl 5.8.0 with
sh Configure -Accflags="-DPERL_Y2KWARN -DPERL_POLLUTE_MALLOC"
I am getting an error that I need a C compiler...but I have gcc installed
through SuSe 8.0 linux...
What's the deal?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: default C compiler
sun solaris have come with perl, But it is use cc as default c
compiler. I don't have license Sun C compiler, Can I change to C
compiler to gcc.
Thanks in advance
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
sun solaris have come with perl, But it is use cc as default c
compiler. I don't have license Sun C compiler, Can I change to C
compiler to gcc.
Thanks in advance
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you are using activestate try
ppm install
If you are using a different flavor try
perl -MCPAN -e "install "
Cheers,
Kristina
I wanted to get the additional modules, so I downloaded the stable.zip
onto
my NT machine and unzipped it, but I haven't been able to get it to
recogni
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 8:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PERL Compiler
As you're a newbie, I thought I'd mention that you don't need to compile
your Perl code, it's done for you by the interpreter before being run.
The interpr
As you're a newbie, I thought I'd mention that you don't need to compile
your Perl code, it's done for you by the interpreter before being run.
The interpreter for Win2k is at http://www.activestate.com/
You probably already know but just in case...
Nigel
>>> "Michael Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
can't
remember who makes it.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PERL Compiler
I'm a sorta newbie to PERL and i was wondering if therte are any good PERL
compilers. Back in June
I'm a sorta newbie to PERL and i was wondering if therte are any good PERL
compilers. Back in June I started to experiment with PERL but it takes a
long time to write. I have a Win 2000 PC.
Cheers
Mikes
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
Dear,
I've tried to compile a script perl through perlcc, but it has returned me the
following error:
bash-2.04# perlcc teste.pl
Compiling teste.pl:
--
Janek --
...and then Janek Schleicher said...
%
% Harry Jackson wrote at Thu, 30 May 2002 18:13:57 +0200:
%
[short post with long disclaimer -- replicated in its entirety! -- snipped]
%
% Allthough, I'm very interested in your information, something seems wrong.
% There's one line pure inform
Harry Jackson wrote at Thu, 30 May 2002 18:13:57 +0200:
> Not sure if anyone is interested but have a look for perlcc on google. It compiles
>perl into c
>
> Harry
>
>
>
>
>*
>COLT
> Telecommunications
> R
On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 09:13 , Jackson, Harry wrote:
>
> Not sure if anyone is interested but have a look for perlcc on google. It
> compiles perl into c
>
> Harry
and if you read the perldoc on it, it's a beta release
and is not guranteed to be sane or stable and it's
not the stuff
Not sure if anyone is interested but have a look for perlcc on google. It
compiles perl into c
Harry
*
COLT Telecommunications
Registered in England No. 2452736
Registered Office: Bishopsgate Court, 4 Norton
Craig Moynes/Markham/IBM [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*>
*>
*>Ok that seems to do the trick, the only thing I am worried about is during
*>the installation to the real directory some data is appended to
*>perllocal.pod. The documentation for MakeMaker say you can disable this
*>with pure_install, bu
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Installing modules
without a C compiler
05/13/02 03:
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 15:01, Craig Moynes/Markham/IBM wrote:
> Hi all,
> Our servers are set up with a single development box, that contains
> all the compilers and what not. All the modules I need to install have to
> be compiled on the development box, and then installed on each server (m
Hi all,
Our servers are set up with a single development box, that contains
all the compilers and what not. All the modules I need to install have to
be compiled on the development box, and then installed on each server (make
install). This works for now, (thanks to nfs) but I would like t
From: "Lanceo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What C compiler does a Makefile.PL file expect?
The one with which your perl was compiled.
I think you can force Make::Maker to create makefiles for gcc, but I
don't remember what exactly has to be changed in Conf
What C compiler does a Makefile.PL file expect? I am having problems
installing the MD5 module into a Perl installation on NT4, and I get a
'can't compile test program' error. When I look at the Makefile.PL
sourcecode, it seems to want to issue the commands to the compiler in
The question came up.
Is a compiler even needed with Perl?
Someone just told us you don't compile it,
and that is one of the advantages to it.
Thanks,
RL
m A favorite
> among Microsoft. ;)
>
> -Chris
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gabriel Presas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 6:53 AM
> To: Chris Sauer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Gabriel Presas (rat432)
> Subject: Re: perl compiler and
PROTECTED]
Cc: Gabriel Presas (rat432)
Subject: Re: perl compiler and editor for windows
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
emacs works well in linux/windows...
free and easy to use
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Sauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: We
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
emacs works well in linux/windows...
free and easy to use
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Sauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:25 PM
Subject: perl compiler and editor for windows
6/06/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> > > Help me I have been desperatly looking for a compiler and editing
> > > program for windows that is free. Please help me!
> > Help me I have been desperatly looking for a compiler and editing
> > program for windows that is free. Please help me!
>
> You need an interpreter; you can use any text editor you want.
> There are some IDEs (if you don't know what that is, think of
> it as a w
as molasses. I use Notepad, personally.
ActiveState also makes the interpreter you'll probably want to
download -- it's called ActivePerl. This and Komodo can be
found at www.activestate.com.
Enjoy.
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Chris Sauer wrote:
> Help me I have been desperatly looking for a
Perl does not use a compiler like C/C++ or Java. So you do not need that.
All you really need is a decent Text editor. Textpad
(http://www.textpad.com) is my personal favorite. It is shareware and well
worth the few dollars charged for a license.
The syntax highlighting and clip libraries
Help me I have been desperatly looking for a compiler and editing program for windows
that is free. Please help me!
75 matches
Mail list logo
