On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 03:32, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> "RW" == Raymond Wan writes:
> RW> Saying the other tutorials are garbage is quite harsh and a bit
> RW> disrespectful to the authors who presumably meant well and didn't do
> RW> it to sabotage Perl's reputation. Maybe they aren't helpfu
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:35:37 +0200, Shlomi Fish
wrote:
On the other hand, most of my
posts (and those of most other active members of the lists) were
replies
for people asking for help, while trying to be helpful. And since I
subscribed I've posted much more posts than you.
Why do you f
that the context is obvious. :-)
>
> Octavian
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chap Harrison"
> To: "Perl Beginners"
> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 6:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [OT] New Document: "How to Start Contributing to or Using Open
> "RW" == Raymond Wan writes:
RW> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 13:28, Uri Guttman wrote:
>>> "NA" == Nathan Arthur writes:
>> NA> from books/tutorials, from this list, and by just writing it. I spent
>> NA> a bunch of time with online tutorials and books before really getting
>>
Happy new years to all of you too!
Sorry for top-post. I think that the context is obvious. :-)
Octavian
- Original Message -
From: "Chap Harrison"
To: "Perl Beginners"
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] New Document: "How to Start Cont
Love conquers all - even those thorny, iconoclastic Perl gurus! Happy New Year.
Chap
(oops, sorry for the top-post ;-)
On Dec 31, 2010, at 8:30 AM, jeff pang wrote:
> 2010/12/31 Raymond Wan :
>
>>
>> If we leave it to just the people who "contribute and help", then it's
>> no longer a list f
2010/12/31 Raymond Wan :
>
> If we leave it to just the people who "contribute and help", then it's
> no longer a list for beginners. It's for the contributors to post
> among themselves.
>
Right. Anyway Happy New Year all Perl gurus and beginners!
Regards.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 13:28, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> "NA" == Nathan Arthur writes:
> NA> from books/tutorials, from this list, and by just writing it. I spent
> NA> a bunch of time with online tutorials and books before really getting
> NA> started, so most of my interest in this list is
> "NA" == Nathan Arthur writes:
NA> First, some background - I'm a long-time programmer, primarily in
NA> java, secondarily in PHP and shell script. I have started working
NA> with a new team who uses perl, so I've had to learn it - from them,
NA> from books/tutorials, from this list
Hello,
I have been lurking on this list for a few months, and I thought
perhaps you'd all like the perspective of a 'newbie' about this issue.
First, some background - I'm a long-time programmer, primarily in
java, secondarily in PHP and shell script. I have started working
with a new team who u
Hi all,
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 19:35, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>> If we take off the parts where you just rip through
>> people's style, platform, or design choices, or reprimand them for not
>> following what you consider to be the One True Way of writing emails,
>> the number is good, but not that
Shlomi,
I'm new to Perl, but I perceive your posts to be among the most well thought
out opinions/instructions on this list and appreciate your willingness to
help. Certainly, your comments are pointed and clear, but you consistently
reference coding styles and idioms that seem to be agreed upo
Dear all
Without involving in this dicussion deeply , i just want to mention
my view . As a newbie in perl as well in this forum i found Shlomi
Fish answers very useful and to the point. So i think blaming
spamming short of thing is not right.
Thanks
On 12/30/10, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On W
On Wednesday 29 Dec 2010 15:11:22 jeff pang wrote:
> 2010/12/29 Erez Schatz :
> > Since most of your posts are related to directing people to your site,
> > I'd say we are about even. In more tightly-moderated lists you'd be
> > banned for spamming.
>
> I agree with this point.
> Directing everyon
Hi Erez,
On Wednesday 29 Dec 2010 09:37:44 Erez Schatz wrote:
> On 12/28/2010 01:04 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Hello Erez (and all),
> >
> > On Tuesday 28 Dec 2010 11:01:40 Erez Schatz wrote:
> >> This is so blatantly OT it shouldn't be on this list.
> >
> > Maybe my impression is a bit biased,
On 2010-12-29, at 8:11 AM, jeff pang wrote:
> 2010/12/29 Erez Schatz :
>
>> Since most of your posts are related to directing people to your site,
>> I'd say we are about even. In more tightly-moderated lists you'd be
>> banned for spamming.
>
> I agree with this point.
> Directing everyone to
2010/12/29 Erez Schatz :
> Since most of your posts are related to directing people to your site,
> I'd say we are about even. In more tightly-moderated lists you'd be
> banned for spamming.
I agree with this point.
Directing everyone to a personal site is always considered rude.
Regards.
--
T
On 12/28/2010 01:04 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hello Erez (and all),
>
> On Tuesday 28 Dec 2010 11:01:40 Erez Schatz wrote:
>> This is so blatantly OT it shouldn't be on this list.
>>
>
> Maybe my impression is a bit biased, but it seems to me that most of your
> posts to this list are replies to
Hello Erez (and all),
On Tuesday 28 Dec 2010 11:01:40 Erez Schatz wrote:
> This is so blatantly OT it shouldn't be on this list.
>
Maybe my impression is a bit biased, but it seems to me that most of your
posts to this list are replies to my posts where you criticise them (and not
in a particu
This is so blatantly OT it shouldn't be on this list.
--
Erez
Observations, not opinions.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/
20 matches
Mail list logo
