On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 05:24:14AM +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> Regarding performance, perhaps there can be a convention regarding
> splitting input files by year.
A note of warning: last time I checked, file inclusion in Beancount was
not (yet) completely transparent. There is stuff you can move to
Just put all the plugins and options in the top-level file.
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 05:24:14AM +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> > Regarding performance, perhaps there can be a convention regarding
> > splitting input files by year.
>
> A not
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 12:45:27PM -0500, Martin Blais wrote:
> Just put all the plugins and options in the top-level file.
My point is precisely that that doesn't work. More precisely: it will
have the effect of making the plugins effective when you process the
top-level file, but ineffective wh
As of now that's not (yet) a huge concern for me starting from ground
zero, but I can see how that would be (maybe?) an issue going forward.
Another option would be to declare the plugins at the top of each file
(there won't be a ton of files this way) in that situation?
My other concern with mult
If the close directive is absent, it just means that the account isn't
closed. Presumably if you don't include the 2016 file your intent is not to
consider history from those times.
Frankly... just put everything in one file. Let the reporting do the work.
That's how it's designed to be used. Some
Tell me, how would you expect / like that the options and plugins
directives be interpreted over multiple files?
What seems to be a good behavior in your view?
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 12:45:27PM -0500, Martin Blais wrote:
> > Just put
I've finally completed the "How Inventories Work" document and opened it up
for public access.
Here:
http://furius.ca/beancount/doc/booking
Or equivalently:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/11a9bIoNuxpSOth3fmfuIFzlZtpTJbvw-bPaQCnezQJs/
Enjoy,
--
You received this message because you are subs
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 02:35:08PM -0500, Martin Blais wrote:
> Tell me, how would you expect / like that the options and plugins
> directives be interpreted over multiple files?
> What seems to be a good behavior in your view?
JFTR: I use a single "big ledger" file, so I don't personally suffer
f
